ISSN 2415-8860 (online), ISSN 0372-4123 (print)
logoUkrainian Botanical Journal
  • 3 of 7
Ukr. Bot. J. 2018, 75(3): 238–247
Plant Taxonomy, Geography and Floristics

A synopsis of the family Fabaceae in the flora of Ukraine. I. Subfamilies Caesalpinoideae, Mimosoideae, Faboideae (tribes Sophoreae, Tephrosieae, Robinieae, Desmodieae, Phaseoleae, Psoraleae, Amorpheae, and Aeschynomeneae)

Fedoronchuk M.M.

The article is the first part of a nomenclatural synopsis of the family Fabaceae in the flora of Ukraine. In the process of preparation of the monographic treatment of the family for the Flora of Ukraine series, the taxonomic composition of the family in Ukraine has been revised. According to updated information, Fabaceae is represented in Ukraine by 379 species (including widely cultivated and escaped ones) belonging to 69 genera, or up to 430 species, with those registered as cultivated in gardens and parks. In this treatment, the traditional subdivision of Fabaceae into three subfamilies (Caesalpinioideae DC., Mimosoideae DC. and Faboideae) is accepted for pragmatic considerations, but with new circumscriptions of tribes and genera following new morphological and molecular phylogenetic data. A synopsis of representatives of subfamilies Caesalpinoideae and Mimosoideae, plus some (early-branching) tribes of Faboideae, is provided, with nomenclatural citations, types, and main synonyms.

Keywords: Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae, Faboideae, system, phylogeny, nomenclature, Ukraine

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 650K

  1. APG IV (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linnean Soc., 2016, 181(1): 1–20.
  2. Broughton W.J., Hernández G., Blair M., Beebe S., Gepts P., Vanderleyden J. Beans (Phaseolus spp.) – model food legumes. Plant Soil, 2003, 252: 55–128.
  3. Bruneau A., Mercure M., Lewis G.P., Herendeen P.S. Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes. Botany (Canada), 2008, 86: 697–718.
  4. Candolle A. de. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 2. Parisiis [Paris]: Sumptibus Sociorum Treuttel et Würtz, 1825.
  5. Cardoso D., Pennington R.T., Queiroz L.P. de, Boatwright J.S., Van Wyk B.-E., Wojciechowski M.F., Lavin M. Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes. S. African J. Bot., 2013, 89: 58–75.
  6. Doyle J.J., Luckow M.A. The Rest of the Iceberg. Legume diversity and evolution in a phylogenetic context. Plant Physiology, 2003, 131: 900–910.
  7. Delgado-Salinas A., Bibler R., Lavin M. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): A recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot., 2006, 31(4): 779–791.
  8. Delgado-Salinas A., Turley T., Richman A., Lavin M. Phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated and species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae). Syst. Bot., 1999, 23: 438–460.
  9. Doyle J.J, Chappill J.A., Bailey C.D., Kajita T. Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of legumes: evidence from rbcL sequences and nonmolecular data. In: Advances in Legume Systematics. Eds P. Herendeen, A. Bruneau. Part 9. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Garden, 2000, pp. 1–20.
  10. Doyle J.J., Doyle J.L., Ballaenger A., Dickson E.E., Kajita T., Ohashi H.A. Phylogeny of the chloroplast gene rbcL in the Leguminosae: taxonomic correlations and insights into the evolution of nodulation. Amer. J. Bot., 1997, 84: 541–554.
  11. Gepts P. Origin and evolution of common bean: past events and recent trends. HortScience, 1998, 33: 1124–1130.
  12. Gepts P., Papa R., Coulibaly S., Gonzălez-Mejía A., Pasquet R. Wild legume diversity and domestication – Insights from molecular methods. In: Wild legumes. Proceedings of the 7th MAFF International Workshop on Genetic Resources. Ed. D. Vaughan. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Agrobiological Resources, 1999, pp. 19–31.
  13. Gonzălez-Mejía A., Wong A., Delgado-Salinas A., Papa R., Gepts P. Assessment of Inter Simple Sequence Repeat Markers to differentiate sympatric wild and domesticated populations of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Crop Science, 2005, 45: 606–615.
  14. Hu J.-M., Lavin M., Wojciechowski M., Sanderson M.J. Phylogenetic systematics of the tribe Millettieae (Leguminosae) based on chloroplast trnK/matK sequences and its implications for evolutionary patterns in Papilionoideae. Amer. J. Bot., 2000, 87: 418–430.
  15. Kajita T., Ohashi H., Tateishi Y., Bailey C.D., Doyle J.J. rbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and allies. Syst. Bot., 2001, 26: 515–536.
  16. Käss E., Wink M. Molecular evolution of the Leguminosae: Phylogeny of the three subfamilies based on rbcL sequences. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 1996, 24: 365–378.
  17. Lavin M., Eshbaugh E., Hu J.-M., Mathews S., Sharrock R.A. Monophyletic subgroups of the tribe Millettieae (Leguminosae) as revealed by phytochrome nucleotide sequence data. Amer. J. Bot., 1998, 85: 412–433.
  18. Lavin M., Herendeen P.S., Wojciechowski M.F. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the Tertiary. Syst. Biol., 2005, 54: 575–594.
  19. Lavin M., Sousa M.S. Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of the tribe Robinieae. Syst. Bot. Monographs, 1995, 45: 1–165.
  20. Lewis G., Schrire B., Mackinder B., Lock M. (eds). Legumes of the world. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 2005.
  21. LPWG [Legume Phylogeny Working Group]. Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21st century: Progress, prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades. Taxon, 2013, 62: 217–248.
  22. LPWG [Legume Phylogeny Working Group]. A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny. Taxon, 2017, 66(1): 44–77.
  23. McMahon M.M., Sanderson M.J. Phylogenetic supermatrix analysis of GenBank sequences from 2228 papilionoid legumes. Syst. Biol., 2006, 55: 818–836.
  24. Magallón S.A., Sanderson M.J. Angiosperm divergence times: The effect of genes, codon positions, and time constraints. Evolution, 2005, 59: 1653–1670.
  25. Pennington R.T., Lavin M., Ireland H., Klitgaard B., Preston J., Hu J.-M. Phylogenetic relationships of basal papilionoid legumes based upon sequences of the chloroplast intron trnL. Syst. Bot., 2001, 26: 537–556.
  26. Polhill R.M., Sousa M. Robinieae. In: Advances in legume systematics. Eds R.M. Polhill, P.H. Raven. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 1981, pp. 283–288.
  27. Ravi V., Khurana J.P., Tyagi A.K., Khurana P. Rosales sister to Fabales: Towards resolving the rosid puzzle. Molec. Phylogen. Evol., 2007, 44: 488–493.
  28. Stevens P.F. (2001–onwards). Angiosperm Phylogeny Website, available at A. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1997, 663 pp.
  29. Wikström N., Savolainen V., Chase M.W. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 2001, 268: 2211–2220.
  30. Wojciechowski M.F. Reconstructing the phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae): an early 21st century perspective. In: Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics. Eds B.B. Klitgaard, A. Bruneau. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 2003, pp. 5–35.
  31. Wojciechowski M.F., Lavin M., Sanderson M.J. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Amer. J. Bot., 2004, 91(11): 1846–1862.
  32. Wojciechowski M.F., Sanderson M.J., Steele K.P., Liston A. Molecular phylogeny of the "temperate herbaceous tribes" of papilionoid legumes: a supertree approach. In: Advances in legume systematics. Part 9. Eds P.S. Herendeen, A. Bruneau. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 2000, pp. 277–298.