ISSN 2415-8860 (online), ISSN 0372-4123 (print)
logoUkrainian Botanical Journal
  • 5 of 9
Up
Ukr. Bot. J. 2017, 74(4): 347–354
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj74.04.347
Vegetation Science, Ecology, Conservation

A classification scheme of shrub biotopes of Ukraine

Didukh Ya.P.
Abstract

The role, place in the spatial structure and functioning of shrub ecosystems as well as causes of underestimation of their importance in the development of dominant-coenotical classification of vegetation are considered. It is noted that the syntaxonomic rank of the shrub ecosystems is raised in the process of development of eco-floristic classification. The current version of EuroVegCheklist includes 10 classes, and some orders and alliances are considered in other classes. In the EUNIS classification of habitats, the shrubs are assigned to a specific type (F), which includes 11 positions of the second hierarchical level and 41 – of the third one, but some shrub habitats are assigned to other types. Based on a critical analysis of the European vegetation and habitats classification, the changes to the classification scheme of the Ukrainian biotopes are proposed. The new version of this scheme includes 7 positions of the second level. This scheme is designed to 4-5 hierarchical levels and is a basis for assessing biodiversity of the Ukrainian biotopes and their identification in relation to the European classifications.

Keywords: classification, biotope, syntaxonomy, vegetation, shrub, Ukraine

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 689K

References
  1. Bilyk G.I. Shrub steppes. In: Vegetation of USSR. Steppes, rocky outcrops, sands, Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1973, pp. 240–245.
  2. Biotopes of the Crimean mountains. Ed. Ya.P. Didukh, Kyiv: Interservis, 2016, 292 pp.
  3. Catalogue of habitat types of the Ukrainian Carpathians and Transcarpathian lowland. Eds A.A. Kagalo, B.G. Prots, Lviv: Merkator, 2012, 294 pp.
  4. Chytrý M., Cučera T., Koči M., Grulich V., Lustyk P. (Eds). Katalog biotopů Česke republiky, 2 ed., Praha: Agentura ochrany prirody a krajiny ČR, 2010, 445 pp.
  5. Cynthia E., Davies C.E., Moss D., Hill M.O. EUNIS habitat classification revised, 2004, 307 pp.
  6. Delarze R., Gonseth Y., Galland P. Guide Des Milieux Naturels De Suisse–Ecologie–Menaces–Espèces Caractéristiques. Edité par Rossolis, Suiss, 2015, 440 pp.
  7. Didukh Ya.P., Kuzemko A.A. Ukr. Phytosoc. Col., Ser. C, 2005, 1(23): 31–61.
  8. Didukh Ya., Mucina L. Validation of names of some syntaxa of the Crimean vegetation. Lazaroa, 2014, 35: 181–190. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_LAZA.2014.v35.47069
  9. Didukh Ya.P., Fitsailo T.V. Biotopes of Cistus tauricus. In: Biotopes of the Crimean mountains. Ed. Ya.P. Didukh, Kyiv: Interservis, 2016, pp. 127–128.
  10. Didukh Ya.P., Fitsailo T.V., Korotchenko I.A., Iakushenko D.M., Pashkevych N.A. Biotopes of Forest and Forest-Steppe zones of Ukraine. Ed. Ya.P. Didukh, Kyiv: MACROS, 2011, 288 pp.
  11. Didukh Ya.P., Shelyag-Sosonko Yu.R. Ukr. Bot. J., 2001, 58(4): 393–403.
  12. Dubyna D.V., Neuhauslova Z., Dziuba T.P., Shelyag-Sosonko Yu.R. Classification and prodrome of vegetation of reservoirs, fllodlands and arenas of the northern Black Sea region, Kyiv: Phytosociocentre, 2004, 200 pp.
  13. European forest types Categories and types for sustainable forest management reporting and policy EEA, Technical report No 9/2006, 2 ed., Copenhagen, 2007, 114 pp.
  14. Fitsailo T.V. Visnyk Lviv. Univ., Ser. Biology, 2016, 71: 72–84.
  15. Golub V.B. Vestnik of the Volga Univ., 2011, 12: 107–110.
  16. Hill M.O., Moss D., Davies C.E. EUNIS habitat classification descriptions, Paris: Europ. Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, 2004.
  17. Magyarország élöhelyei. Vegetációtipusok leirása és határozója. Ánér, Vácrátót: MTA Ökológiai és Botanikai Kutatóintézete, 2011, 441 pp.
  18. Pahlsson L. Vegetation types of the Nordic countries, Copenhagen: Tema Nord, 1994, 665 pp.
  19. Rodwell J.S., Janssen J.A.M., Gubbay S., Schaminée J.H.J. Red List Assessment of European Habitat Types, a Feasibility Study, Unpubl. report to DG Environment, Wageningen, 2013.
  20. Rodwell J.S., Schaminée J.H.J., Mucina L., Pignatti S., Dring J., Moss D. The scientific basis of the EUNIS Habitat Classification. In: Report to the European Topic Centre on Nature Conservation, Lancaster: Unit of Veget. Sci. of Lancaster Univ., 1998.
  21. Rodwell J.S., Schaminée J.H.J., Mucina L., Pignatti S., Dring J., Moss D. The Diversity of European Vegetation. An overview of phytosociological alliances and theirrelationships to EUNIS habitats, Wageningen: Nat. Ref. Centre for Agricult., Nature and Fisheries, 2002.
  22. Rodwell J.S., Schaminée J.H.J., Mucina L., Pignatti S., Dring J., Moss D. The diversity of European vegetation. An overview of phytosociological alliances and their relationships to EUNIS habitats, Wageningen: Nat. Ref. Centre for Agricult., Nature and Fisheries, 2002, 168 pp.
  23. Solomakha I.V., Vorobiov E.O., Moisienko I.I. The vegetation cover of forests and shrubs of northern Black Sea, Kyiv: Phytosociocentre, 2015, 387 pp.