ISSN 2415-8860 (online), ISSN 0372-4123 (print)
logoUkrainian Botanical Journal
  • 7 of 8
Up
Ukr. Bot. J. 2025, 82(6): 577–593
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj82.06.577
Biotechnology, Physiology and Biochemistry

Main trends in applying physiology to plant breeding, yield improvement, and stress resistance in Ukraine

Kots S.Ya., Stasik O.O., Kiriziy D.A., Morgun V.V.
Abstract

The review highlights the main trends in the use of achievements in plant physiology in breeding and the contribution of scientists from the Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics of the NAS of Ukraine to solving the problems of increasing plant productivity and stress resistance. In particular, as a result of many years of research into the genotypic features of morphology and functioning of the photosynthetic apparatus of a wide range of wheat varieties at the levels from chloroplast to agrocenosis, a number of physiological and morphological traits have been identified, which are recommended for use as phenotypic markers in the selection of this most important agricultural crop for productivity and drought resistance. A number of studies of the physiological and biochemical characteristics of genetically modified wheat plants with an increased proline content both under normal conditions and under the influence of drought were also conducted. A conclusion was made about the prospects of their involvement in breeding programs to increase resistance to abiotic stress factors. A wide range of highly effective strains of nodule bacteria, complementary to a number of leading legume crops, were selected, including using transposon mutagenesis. New technologies for their use in inoculums were developed, taking into account the genetic characteristics of the crop, which contribute to the maximum realization of the productivity potential of the legume-rhizobial symbiosis and protect against the negative effects of biotic and abiotic stress factors. Technologies for the use of mixtures of specially selected strains of associative and free-living nitrogen-fixing microorganisms to intensify the cultivation of various wheat varieties were also developed. It is known that in order to fully reveal the genetic potential of modern agricultural crops, it is necessary to develop new or significantly improve existing technologies for their cultivation and take care of protection against diseases, pests and weeds. Such technologies have been developed to increase the efficiency of nitrogen use by modern high-intensity wheat varieties. The use of tank mixtures for foliar feeding of plants together with protective agents and growth regulators has been scientifically substantiated and implemented in practice, which has a significant economic effect. Thus, plant physiologists and geneticists of the Institute closely cooperate both in fundamental scientific research and for the benefit of the agricultural sector of Ukraine and strengthening its food security.

Keywords: breeding, food secuirity, new technologies, physiological markers, plant physiology, productivity, stress resistance

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 263K

References
  1. Abbo S., Gopher A. 2020. Plant domestication in the Neolithic Near East: The humans-plants liaison. Quaternary Science Reviews, 242: art. 106412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106412
  2. Adel S., Carels N. 2023. Plant tolerance to drought stress with emphasis on wheat. Plants, 12: 2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112170
  3. Alsamman A.M., Bousba R., Baum M., Hamwieh A., Fouad N. 2021. Comprehensive analysis of the gene expression profile of wheat at the crossroads of heat, drought and combined stress. Highlights in BioScience, 4: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.36462/H.BioSci.202104
  4. Araus J.L., Ferrio J.P., Buxo R., Voltas J. 2007. The historical perspective of dryland agriculture: lessons learned from 10000 years of wheat cultivation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(2): 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl133
  5. Araus J.L., Sanchez-Bragado, R., Vicente R. 2021. Improving crop yield and resilience through optimization of photosynthesis: panacea or pipe dream? Journal of Experimental Botany, 72(11): 3936–3955. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab097
  6. Bandurska H. 2022. Drought stress responses: coping strategy and resistance. Plants, 11: 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070922
  7. Bapela T., Shimelis H., Tsilo T., Mathew I. 2022. Genetic improvement of wheat for drought tolerance: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Plants, 11: 1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11101331
  8. Condon A.G. 2020. Drying times: plant traits to improve crop water use efficiency and yield. Journal of Experimental Botany, 71(7): 2239–2252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa002
  9. Dubrovna O.V., Mikhalska S.I., Komisarenko A.G. 2022. Using of proline metabolism genes in plant genetic engineering. Cytology and Genetics, 56(4): 361–378. https://doi.org/10.3103/S009545272204003X
  10. El-Mouhamady A., El-Hawary M., Habouh M. 2023. Transgenic wheat for drought stress tolerance: a review. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research, 12(1): 77–94. https://doi.org/10.36632/mejar/2023.12.1.7
  11. Faralli M., Lawson T. 2020. Natural genetic variation in photosynthesis: an untapped resource to increase crop yield potential? The Plant Journal, 101: 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14568
  12. Farooq M., Wahid A., Zahra N., Hafeez M.B., Siddique K.H.M. 2024. Recent advances in plant drought tolerance. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 43: 3337–3369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11351-6
  13. Furbank R.T., Jimenez-Berni J.A., George-Jaeggli B., Potgieter A.B., Deery D.M. 2019. Field crop phenomics: enabling breeding for radiation use efficiency and biomass in cereal crops. New Phytologist, 223: 1714–1727. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15817
  14. Gaju O., Vincent A., Martre P., Le Gouis J., Moreau D., Bogard M., Hubbart-Edwards S., Foulkes M. 2013. Nitrogen partitioning and remobilization in relation to leaf senescence, grain yield and grain nitrogen concentration in wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research, 155: 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.003
  15. Kandić V., Savić J., Raňcić D., Dodig D. 2023. Contribution of agro-physiological and morpho-anatomical traits to grain yield of wheat genotypes under post-anthesis stress induced by defoliation. Agriculture, 13: 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030673
  16. Katamadze A., Vergara-Díaz O., Uberegui E., Yoldi-Achalandabaso A., Araus J. L., Vicente R. 2023. Evolution of wheat architecture, physiology, and metabolism during domestication and further cultivation: lessons for crop improvement. The Crop Journal, 11(4): 1080–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2023.06.006
  17. Kedruk A.C., Kiriziy D.A., Sokolovska-Sergienko O.G., Stasik O.O. 2021. Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of winter wheat varieties to the combined action of drought and high temperature. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 53(5): 387–405. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2021.05.387
  18. Khan S., Anwar S., Yu S., Sun M., Yang Z., Gao Z. 2019. Development of drought-tolerant transgenic wheat: achievements and limitations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20: 3350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133350
  19. Kiriziy D.A., Kedruk A.S., Sokolovska-Sergiienko O.G., Dubrovna O.V., Stasik O.O. 2021. Responses of photosynthetic apparatus of genetically modified wheat plants containing a double-stranded RNA suppressor of the proline dehydrogenase gene to drought and high temperature. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 53(6): 532–549. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2021.06.532
  20. Kiriziy D., Kots S., Rybachenko L., Pukhtaievych P. 2022. Inoculation of soybean seeds by rhizobia with nanometal carboxylates reduces the negative effect of drought on N2 and CO2 assimilation. Plant, Soil and Environment, 68(11): 510–515. https://doi.org/10.17221/287/2022-PSE
  21. Kiriziy D.A., Kedruk A.S., Sokolovska-Sergiienko O.G., Makharynska N.M., Stasik O.O. 2024a. Features of light induction of gas exchange in wheat leaves under drought of different duration and during the recovery period. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 56(3): 230–253. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2024.03.230
  22. Kiriziy D., Kots S., Stasik O., Pukhtaievych P., Kukol K., Rybachenko L. 2024b. Effect of inoculation with diazotrophs and treatment with solution of trace elements obtained by nanotechnology on wheat. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 25(1): 110–119. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/25.1.3970
  23. Kiriziy D.A., Stasik O.O., Dubrovna O.V., Sokolovska-Sergiienko O.G., Holoboroda A.S. 2024c. Effect of drought on the leaf photoassimilation activity and productivity of genetically modified wheat plants with partial suppression of the proline dehydrogenase gene. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 56(6): 495–514. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2024.06.495
  24. Kots S.Ya. 2016. The study of biological nitrogen fixation at the Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics of NAS of Ukraine. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 48(3): 215–231. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2016.03.215
  25. Kots S.Ya. 2021. Biological nitrogen fixation: achievements and prospects. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 53(2): 128–159. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2021.02.128
  26. Kots S.Ya., Gryshchuk O.O. 2019. Phytohormonal regulation of legume-rhizobium symbiosis. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 51(1): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2019.01.003
  27. Kots S.Ya., Mykhalkiv L.M. 2019. Nitrate reductase and its role in legume-rhizobia symbiosis. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 51(5): 371–387. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2019.05.371
  28. Kots S., Kiriziy D., Pavlyshche A., Rybachenko L. 2022. Peculiarities of formation and functioning of the soybean-bradyrhizobium japonicum symbiotic apparatus in relation to photosynthetic activity under the influence of seed protectants. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 11(6): e3128. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.3128
  29. Leister D. 2023. Enhancing the light reactions of photosynthesis: strategies, controversies, and perspectives. Molecular Plant, 16(1): 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2022.08.005
  30. Liu Y., Zhang P., Li M., Chang L., Cheng H., Chai S., Yang D. 2020. Dynamic responses of accumulation and remobilization of water soluble carbohydrates in wheat stem to drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 155: 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.07.024
  31. Lopez M.A., Xavier A., Rainey K.M. 2019. Phenotypic variation and genetic architecture for photosynthesis and water use efficiency in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr). Frontiers in Plant Science, 10: 680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00680
  32. Morgun V.V., Stasik O.O., Frantiychuk V.V., Kiriziy D.A., Sytnyk S.K. 2016a. Analysis of relationships between the photosynthetic traits of flag leaf and the components of spike productivity in winter wheat varieties of different selection periods. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 48(4): 356–365. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2016.04.356
  33. Morgun V.V., Stasik O.O., Kiriziy D.A., Pryadkina G.O. 2016b. Relations between reactions of photosynthetic traits and grain productivity on soil drought in winter wheat varieties contrasting in their tolerance. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 48(5): 371–381. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2016.05.371
  34. Morgun V.V., Stasik O.O., Tarasiuk M.V., Kiriziy D.A. 2024. Storage capacity of different stem parts and its role for grain productivity of short-term drought-exposed winter wheat genotypes contrasting in drought tolerance. Plant Breeding & Seed Production, 125: 6–31. https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2024.306963
  35. Morgun V.V., Stasik O.O., Kiriziy D.A., Sokolovska-Sergiienko O.G. 2019. Effect of drought on photosynthetic apparatus, activity of antioxidant enzymes, and productivity of modern winter wheat varieties. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 10(1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.15421/021903
  36. Morgun V.V., Tarasiuk M.V., Priadkina G.A., Stasik O.O. 2022. Depositing capacity of winter wheat stem segments under natural drought during grain filling in Ukrainian Forest Steppe conditions. Biosystems Diversity, 30(2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.15421/012217
  37. Murchie E.H., Reynolds M., Slafer G.A., Foulkes M.J., Siaca L.A., Ausland L.M., Sharwood R., Griffiths S., Flavell R.B., Gwyn J., Sawkins M., Silva E.S. 2023. A ‘wiring diagram’ for source strength traits impacting wheat yield potential. Journal of Experimental Botany, 74(1): 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac415
  38. Neupane D., Adhikari P., Bhattarai D., Rana B., Ahmed Z., Sharma, U., Adhikari D. 2022. Does climate change affect the yield of the top three cereals and food security in the world? Earth, 3: 45–71. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3010004
  39. Ntawuguranayo S., Zilberberg M., Nashef K., Bonfil D.J., Bainsla N.K., Piñera-Chavez F.J., Reynolds M.P., Peleg Z., Ben-David R. 2024. Stem traits promote wheat climate-resilience. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15: 1388881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1388881
  40. Parry M.A., Reynolds M., Salvucci M.E. Raines C.P. Andralojc J., Zhu X.-G., Price G.D., Condon A.G., Furbank R.T. 2011. Raising yield potential of wheat. II. Increasing photosynthetic capacity and efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(2): 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq304
  41. Pequeno D.N.L., Hernandez-Ochoa I.M., Reynolds M., Sonder K., Molero Milan A., Robertson R.D., Lopes M.S., Xiong W., Kropff M., Asseng S. 2021. Climate impact and adaptation to heat and drought stress of regional and global wheat production. Environmental Research Letters, 16: 054070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd970
  42. Pessarakli M. (Ed.) 2021. Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1200 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003093640
  43. Priadkina G.A., Morgun V.V. 2016. The photosynthetic pigments and winter wheat productivity. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 48(4): 310–323. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2016.04.310
  44. Priadkina G.O., Makharynska N.M., Sokolovska-Sergiienko O.G. 2022. Influence of drought on photosynthetic traits of wheat plants. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 54(6): 463–483. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2022.06.463
  45. Priadkina G.O., Makharynska N.M., Tarasiuk M.V. 2024. The influence of leaves assimilation surface loss in different winter wheat varieties during the flowering–milk-wax ripeness period on grain filling. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 56(4): 343–352. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2024.04.343
  46. Priadkina G.O., Makharynska N.M., Kedruk A.S., Kharkhota M.A. 2023. Drought influence on pigments of xanthophyll cycle in winter wheat leaves. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 55(6): 539–547. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2023.06.539
  47. Priadkina G.O., Stasik O.O., Poliovyi A.M., Yarmolska O.E., Kuzmova K. 2020. Radiation use efficiency of winter wheat canopy during pre-anthesis growth. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 52(3): 208–223. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2020.03.208
  48. Raza A., Khare T., Zhang X., Rahman M.M., Hussain M., Gill S.S., Chen Z.-H., Zhou M., Hu Z., Varshney R.K. 2025. Novel strategies for designing climate-smart crops to ensure sustainable agriculture and future food security. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 4: e70048. https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.70048
  49. Reynolds M., Slafer G., Foulkes J., Griffiths S., Murchie E., Carmo-Silva E., Asseng S., Chapman S., Sawkins M., Gwyn J., Flavell R. 2022. A wiring diagram to integrate physiological traits of wheat yield potential. Nature Food, 3(5): 318–324. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00512z
  50. Reznikoff W.S. 2008. Transposon Tn5. Annual Review of Genetics, 42: 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091656
  51. Roychowdhury R., Ghatak A., Kumar M., Samantara K., Weckwerth W., Chaturvedi P. 2024. Accelerating wheat improvement through trait characterization: advances and perspectives. Physiologia Plantarum, 176(5): e14544. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.14544
  52. Schwartau V.V., Mykhalska L.M. 2016. Physiological basis of high-yielded cereals nutrition. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 48(4): 298–309. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2016.04.298
  53. Schwartau V.V., Mykhalska L.M. 2022. Herbicide-resistant weed biotypes in Ukraine. Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 6: 85–94. https://doi.org/10.15407/dopovidi2022.06.085
  54. Senapati N., Stratonovitch P., Paul M.J., Semenov M.A. 2019. Drought tolerance during reproductive development is important for increasing wheat yield potential under climate change in Europe. Journal of Experimental Botany, 70(9): 2549–2560. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery226
  55. Slafer G.A., Foulkes M.J., Reynolds M.P., Murchie E.H., Carmo-Silva E., Flavell R., Gwyn J., Sawkins M., Griffiths, S. 2023. A ‘wiring diagram’ for sink strength traits impacting wheat yield potential. Journal of Experimental Botany, 74: 40–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac410
  56. Slattery R.A., Ort D. R. 2021. Perspectives on improving light distribution and light use efficiency in crop canopies. Plant Physiology, 185(1): 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaa006
  57. Stafleu F.A. 1971. Linnaeus and the Linnaeans. The spreading of their ideas in systematic botany, 1735–1789. Utrecht: International Association for Plant Taxonomy, xvi + 386 pp.
  58. Stasik O.O., Kiriziy D.A. 2011. Regulatory mechanisms and limiting factors in the photosynthesis–productivity relationships and prospects for their optimization. Physiology and biochemistry of cultivated plants, 43(3): 226–238.
  59. Stasik O.O., Kiriziy D.A., Priadkina G.O. 2021. Photosynthesis and productivity: main scientific achievements and innovative developments. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 53(2): 160–184. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2021.02.160
  60. Tarasiuk M.V., Stasik O.O. 2022. The effect of drought at flowering stage on the dynamics of accumulation and remobilization of reserve water-soluble carbohydrates in stem segments of winter wheat varieties contrasting in drought resistance. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 54(5): 429–449. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2022.05.429
  61. Tian Z., Chai H., Guo H., Lu Y., Yang S., Liu X., Jiang D., Cao W., Dai T. 2024. Genetic improvement of photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency of winter wheat in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Field Crops Research, 305: 109199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109199
  62. Vorobey N.A., Kots S.Ya. 2018. Selection strategy for improved symbiotic phenotypes of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 50(4): 344–357. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2018.04.344
  63. Vorobey N.A., Kots S.Ya., Kudryavchenko L.A., Pukhtayevych P.P. 2017. Biotechnology of creation active Tn5-mutants of Rhizobium galegae. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 49(5): 425–433. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2017.05.425
  64. Wasaya A., Manzoor S., Yasir T.A., Sarwar N., Mubeen K., Ismail I.A., Raza A., Rehman A., Hossain A., EL Sabagh A. 2021. Evaluation of fourteen bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes by observing gas exchange parameters, relative water and chlorophyll content, and yield attributes under drought stress. Sustainability, 13(9): 4799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094799
  65. Zahra N., Hafeez M.B., Kausar A., Al Zeidi M., Asekova S., Siddique K.H.M., Farooq M. 2023. Plant photosynthetic responses under drought stress: Effects and management. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 209: 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12652
  66. Zhu X.-G., Hasanuzzaman M., Jajoo A., Lawson T., Lin R., Liu C.-M., Liu L.-N., Liu Z., Lu C., Moustakas M., Roach T., Song Q., Yin X., Zhang W. 2022. Improving photosynthesis through multidisciplinary efforts: The next frontier of photosynthesis research. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 967203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.967203