ISSN 2415-8860 (online), ISSN 0372-4123 (print)
logoUkrainian Botanical Journal
  • 3 of 6
Up
Ukr. Bot. J. 2021, 78(2): 112–122
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj78.02.112
Fungi and Fungi-like Organisms

Characterisation and identification of ectomycorrhizae formed by the species of Asproinocybe (Tricholomataceae) and Inocybe (Inocybaceae) with the roots of the tropical sal tree Shorea robusta (Dipterocarpaceae)

Kumar J.1, Atri N.S.2
Abstract

In the course of the present study, surveys on occurrence and distribution of ectomycorrhizal (EcM) fungi in tropical sal forests of foothills of the Himalayas, India, were undertaken. The species of two genera of agarics, namely Asproinocybe and Inocybe, were found organically associated with the roots of Shorea robusta (sal tree). However, prior to our study the genus Asproinocybe has not been reported from India. In this article, the morpho-anatomical details of mycorrhizal roots of Shorea robusta associated with Asproinocybe lactifera and Inocybe purpureoflavida are provided for the first time. The EcM colonized roots of the two species are distinguished by differences in the shape and colour of the roots, surface texture, size and shape of cystidia, type of mantle, as well as different chemical reactions. Asproinocybe lactifera EcM is mainly characterised by a monopodial pinnate mycorrhizal system with the dark brown to reddish brown and loose cottony surface, while in Inocybe purpureoflavida it is irregularly pinnate to coralloid, silvery grey to reddish brown, with densely woolly surface. The outer mantle layer is heterogeneous with obclavate to awl-shaped cystidia in Asproinocybe lactifera, whereas Inocybe purpureoflavida EcM have a plectenchymatous outer mantle with subcylindrical to obclavate metuloidal and non-metuloidal cystidia. The presence of lactifers in the mantle is a unique feature in Asproinocybe lactifera as compared to Inocybe purpureoflavida.

Keywords: ectomycorrhiza, Hartig net, mantle, mushrooms, rhizomorphs, sporophores, sal, Shiwalik

Full text: PDF (Eng) 2.11M

References
  1. Agerer R. 1986. Studies on ectomycorrhizae III. Mycorrhizae formed by four fungi in the genera Lactarius and Russula on spruce. Mycotaxon, 27: 1–59.
  2. Agerer R. 1987–2002. Colour Atlas of Ectomycorrhizae. 1st–15th editions. Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany: Einhorn Verlag.
  3. Agerer R. 2006. Fungal relationships and structural identity of their ectomycorrhizae. Mycological Progress, 5(2): 67– 107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0505-x
  4. Agerer R., Rambold G. 2004–2020. DEEMY – An Information System for Characterization and Determination of Ectomycorrhizae. München, Germany. Available at: www. deemy.de (Assessed 4 March 2020)
  5. Alexander I., Selosse MA. 2009. Mycorrhizas in tropical forests: a neglected research imperative. New Phytologist, 182(1): 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02798.x
  6. Atri N.S., Kaur A., Kour H. 2005. Wild Mushrooms – Collection and Identification. In: Frontiers in Mushroom Biotechnology. Eds R.D. Rai, R.C. Upadhyay, S.R. Sharma. Chambaghat, Solan, India: NRCM, pp. 9–26.
  7. Atri N.S., Kaur M., Sharma S. 2017. Characterization of Lamellate Mushrooms – An Appraisal. In: Developments in Fungal Biology and Applied Mycology. Eds T. Satyanarayana, S. Deshmukh, B.N. Johri. Springer, Singapore, pp. 471–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4768-8_24
  8. Bakshi B.K. 1974. Mycorrhiza and its role in forestry. [Project report – P.L. 480]. Dehradun: Forest Research Institute, 89 pp.
  9. Champion H.G., Seth S.K. 1968. A revised survey of the forest types of India. New Delhi Manager of Publications, Govt. of India, 404 pp.
  10. Frank B. 1885. Ueber die auf Wurzelsymbiose beruhende Ernährung gewiser Bäume durch unterirdishe Pilze. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft, 3: 128–145.
  11. Guzmán G., Ramirez-Guillan F., Contu M., Rodríguez O., Guzmán-Davalos L. 2004. New records of Asproinocybe and Tricholosporum (Agaricales, Tricholomataceae). Documents Mycologiques, 33: 23–28.
  12. Heim R. 1970. Breves diagnoses latinae novitatum genericarum specificarum que nuper descriptarum. Revue de Mycologie, 34(4): 343–347.
  13. Heinemann P. 1977. Un nouvel Asproinocybe (Tricholomataceae) du Zaire. Bulletin de Jardin Botanique National de Belgique, 47: 265. https://doi.org/10.2307/3668001
  14. Kornerup A., Wanscher J.A. 1978. Methuen Handbook of Colour. 3rd ed. London: Eyre Methuen, 252 pp.
  15. Kumar J., Atri N.S. 2016. Characterisation of ectomycorrhiza of Russula and Lactifluus (Russulaceae) associated with Shorea robusta from Indian Shiwaliks. Nova Hedwigia, 103(3–4): 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2016/0368
  16. Kumar J., Atri N.S. 2018. Studies on ectomycorrhiza: an appraisal. The Botanical Review, 84: 108–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-017-9196-z
  17. Kumar J., Atri N.S. 2019. Characterisation and identification of ectomycorrhizae of Russula (Russulaceae: Basidiomycota) associated with Shorea robusta. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 31: 114–124. https://doi.org/10.26525/jtfs2019.31.1.114124
  18. Kumar J., Atri N.S. 2020a. Ectomycorrhizal biology of Shorea robusta roots in association with Russula Pers. (Russulaceae, Basidiomycota) from foothills of Himalayas, India. Annals of Plant Sciences, 9(4): 3798–3811.
  19. Kumar J., Atri N.S. 2020b. New records of lamellate mushrooms associated with Sal from Shiwaliks, India. Kavaka, 54: 30–37. https://doi.org/10.36460/Kavaka/54/2020/30-37
  20. Lebel T., Syme K., Barrett M. Cooper J.A. 2020. Two new species of Asproinocybe (Tricholomataceae) from Australasia. Muelleria, 38: 77–85.
  21. Lee L.S., Alexander I.J., Watling R. 1997. Ectomycorrhiza and putative ectomycorrhizal fungi of Shorea leprosula Miq. (Dipterocarpaceae). Mycorrhiza, 7(2): 63–81. https://doi. org/10.1007/s005720050165
  22. Mohan V., Natarjan K., Ingleby K. 1993a. Anatomical studies on ectomycorrhizas. I. The ectomycorrhizas produced by Thelephora terrestris on Pinus patula. Mycorrhiza, 3(1): 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213466
  23. Mohan V., Natarajan K., Ingleby K. 1993b. Anatomical studies on ectomycorrhizas. II. The ectomycorrhizas produced by Amanita muscaria, Laccaria laccata and Suillus brevipes on Pinus patula. Mycorrhiza, 3(1): 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213467
  24. Mohan V., Natarajan K., Ingleby K. 1993c. Anatomical studies on ectomycorrhizas. III. The ectomycorrhizas produced by Rhizopogan luteolus and Scleroderma citrinum on Pinus patula. Mycorrhiza, 3(2): 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210692
  25. Natarajan K., Senthilrasu G., Kumaresan V., Riviera T. 2005. Diversity in ectomycorrhizal fungi of a dipterocarp forest in Western Ghats. Current Science, 88(12): 1893–1895.
  26. Pradeep C.K., Vrinda K.B. 2010. Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity in three different forest types and their association with endemic, indigenous and exotic species in the Western Ghats forests of Thiruvananthapurum district, Kerala. Journal of Mycopathological Research, 48(2): 279–289.
  27. Pyasi A., Soni K.K., Verma R.K. 2011. Dominant occurrence of ectomycorrhizal colonizer Astraeus hygrometricus of Sal (Shorea robusta) in forest of Jharsuguda Orissa. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 41(2): 222–225.
  28. Pyasi A., Soni K.K., Verma R.K. 2013. Effect of ectomycorrhizae on growth and establishment of Sal (Shorea robusta) seedlings in central India. Nusantara Bioscience, 5(1): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.13057/nusbiosci/n050107
  29. Riviére T., Diedhiou A.G., Diabate M., Senthilarasu G., Natarajan K., Verbeken A., Buyck B., Dreyfus B., Bena G., Ba A.M. 2007. Genetic diversity of ectomycorrhizal basidiomycetes from African and Indian tropical forests. Mycorrhiza, 17: 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-007-0117-6
  30. Roman M.D., Claveria V., Miguel A.M.D. 2005. A revision of the descriptions of ectomycorrhizas published since 1961. Mycological Research, 109(10): 1063–1104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756205003564
  31. Rinaldi A.C., Comandini O., Kuyper T.W. 2008. Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity: separating the wheat from chaff. Fungal Diversity, 33: 1–45.
  32. Shi N.N., Gao C., Zheng Y., Guo L.D. 2017. Effects of ectomycorrhizal fungal identity and diversity on subtropical tree competition. Journal of Plant Ecology, 10: 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtw060
  33. Singer R. 1986. The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy. 4th ed. Koenigstein, Federal Republic of Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books, 981 pp.
  34. Singh J.S., Singh S.P. 1992. Forests of Himalaya: Structure, Functioning and Impact of Man. Naini Tal, India: Gyanodaya Prakashan, 294 pp.
  35. Smith S.E., Read D.J. 2008. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 3rd ed. Academic Press, New York, 815 pp.
  36. Tapwal A., Kumar R., Borah D. 2015. Effect of mycorrhizal inoculations on the growth of Shorea robusta seedlings. Nusantara Bioscience, 7: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.13057/nusbiosci/n070101
  37. Tapwal A., Kumar R., Pandey S. 2013. Diversity and frequency of macrofungi associated with wet evergreen tropical forest in Assam, India. Biodiversitas, 14(2): 73–78. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d140204
  38. Tedersoo L., May T.W., Smith M.E. 2010. Ectomycorrhizal lifestyle in fungi: global diversity, distribution, and evolution of phylogenetic lineages. Mycorrhiza, 20(4): 217–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-009-0274-x
  39. Vrinda K.B., Pradeep C.K., Mathew S., Abraham T.K. 1997. Inocybe purpureoflavida sp. nov. (Cortinariaceae) from Western Ghats of Kerala State, India. Mycotaxon, 64: 1–6.
  40. Wang X., Liu J., Long D., Han Q., Huang J. 2017. The ectomycorrhizal fungal communities associated with Quercus liaotungensis in different habitats across northern China. Mycorrhiza, 27(5): 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-017-0762-3
  41. Zak B. 1973. Classification of ectomycorrhizae. In: Ectomycorrhizae. Eds. G.C. Marks, T.T. Kozlowski. New York: Academic Press, pp. 43–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-472850-9.50008-6