Ukr. Bot. J. 2015, 72(5): 487–497 https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj72.05.487Plant Physiology, Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology
Ultrastructure of photosynthetic apparatus and pigment content of floating and submerged leaves of Nuphar lutea and Nymphaea alba
Klymenko E.N.- M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
- 2, Tereshchenkivska Str., Kyiv, 01004, Ukraine
Abstract
The leaf mesophyll cells ultrastructure and pigment content of heterophyllous aquatic plants Nuphar lutea (L.) Smith. and Nymphaea alba L. are reported. The ultrastructural differences of submerged and floating leaves were determined. Submerged leaf chloroplasts are located along the periclinal cell walls. They have significantly greater linear dimensions, contain grana with a large number of thylakoids, and have greater partial volume of photosynthetic membranes. The difference in the content of pigments in leaves was demonstrated: submerged leaves had the highest content of chlorophyll and carotenoids per unit of dry weight; floating leaves had the lowest one. The opposite trend was observed in the content of pigments per unit area. Based on the analysis of the obtained data and the literature data on the plasticity of the photosynthetic apparatus of plants, a model of underwater leaves adaptation to the aquatic environment was proposed.
Keywords: Nuphar lutea, Nymphaea alba, leaf, heterophylly, ultrastructure, pigments
Full text: PDF (Ukr) 7.42M
References
- Anderson I.M., Goodchild D.I., Boardman N.K. Biochim. Biophys., 1973, 325, pp. 573–585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(73)90217-X
- Benjamina K.J., Walker D.I., McComba A.J. Aquat. Bot., 1999, 64, pp. 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(98)00103-X
- Dubyna D.V. Kuvshinkovye Ukrainy, Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1982, 230 p.
- Gamaleyi U.I., Kylikov G.V. Razvitie chlorenchimy lista, Leningrad: Nauka, 1978, 192 p.
- Germ M., Gabersčik A. Photosynthetica, 2003, 41(1): 91–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025816614572
- Goodchild D.J., Björkman O., Pyliotis N.A. Carnegie Inst. Ann. Rept. Dir. Dep. Plant Biol., 1972: 102–107.
- Grumbach K. Biosynthesis of carotenoids and quinones in higher plants and their participation in photosynthesis. In: Structure, function and metabolism of plant lipids. P.-A. Siegenthaler, W. Eichenberg., Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci. Publ., 1984, pp. 245–257.
- Klančnik K., Mlinar M., Gabersčik A. Aquat. Bot., 2011, 98: 20–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.12.004
- Klymenko O.M., Anatomiya plavayuchykh ta pidvodnykh lystkiv heterofilnoi roslyny Nymphaea candida L. In: Materialy 3 mizhnar. nauk. konf. z morfolohii roslyn ‘Suchasna fitomorfolohiya’, Lviv, 2014, pp. 327–330.
- Klymenko O.M. Morphology and anatomy features of leaves of heterophyllous plants Nuphar lutea (L.) Smith. and Nymphaea alba L. In: Agrobiodiversity for improving nutrition, health and life quality, part 1, 2015, pp. 345–348.
- Kordyum E.L. Sovremennye problemy kletochnoyi biologii rasteniy. In: Botanika i mikologiya na puti v tretie tysyacheletie. Ed. S.P. Wasser, Kyiv: Naukova Dumka., 1996, pp. 245–255.
- Kordyum E.L., Sytnik K.M., Baranenko V.V. Kletochnye mekhanismy adaptatsii rastenyi, Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 2003, 229 p.
- Kordyum E.L., Klimenko E.N. Aquat. bot., 2013, 110: 84–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2013.05.013
- Lichtenthaler H.K., Buschmann C., Doll M. Photosynth. Res., 1981, 2: 115–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00028752
- Lichtenthaler H.K., Buschmann C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measument and characterization by UV-vis spectroscopy. In: Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. Ed. R.E. Wrolstad, Canada: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2000, pp. 171–179.
- Marschall M., Proctor M.C.F. Ann. Bot., 2004, 94: 593–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch178
- Milashvili T.P., Gamaleyi U.V. Tsitologia, 1985, 27(5): 511–517.
- Mommer L., Visser E. Ann. Bot., 2005, 96(4): 581–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci212
- Momokawa N., Kadono Y., Kudoh H. Ann. Bot., 2011, 108: 1299–1306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr236
- Nedukha O.M. Heterophylly of plants, Kyiv: Alterpress, 2011, 192 p.
- Ojangurena C.T., Goulden M.L. Aquat. bot., 2013, 111: 54–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2013.08.007
- Olesen B., Madsen T.V. Funct. Ecol., 2000, 14: 252–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00412.x
- Pearcy R.W., Franceschp V.R. Photosynth. Res., 1986, 9: 317–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00029797
- Popova O.F., Slemnev N.N., Popova I.A. Botan. zhurn., 1984, 69: 334–344.
- Reynolds E.S. J. Cell Biol., 1963, 17: 208–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.17.1.208
- Ronzhyna D.A., Nekrasova G.V., Piankov V.I. Fiziol. rast., 2004, 51(1): 27–34.
- Silaeva A.M., Silaev A.V. Fiziol. biokh. kelt. rast., 1979, 6: 547–562.
- Van T.K., Hailer W.T., Bowes G., Garrard L.A. J. Aquat. Plant. Manag., 1977, 15: 29–31.
- Wentworth M., Murchie E.H., Gray J.E. J. Exper. Bot., 2006, 57(3): 699–709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj061
- Young J.P., Dengler N.G., Donnelly P.M. Ann. Bot., 1990, 65: 603–615.
- Zauralova N.O. Botan. zhurn., 1980, 65(10): 1439–1446.