Typification of the elm species names Ulmus procera Salisb. and U. sativa Mill. is discussed. Both these names are lectotypified on illustrations (which seem to be the only extant original material for each name) published in Gerard’s The Herball, or, Generall historie of plantes, i.e., respectively, “Ulmus vulgatissima folio lato scabro” and “Ulmus minor, folio angusto, scabro”. The available molecular and morphological data indicate that the plants placed in U. procera are related to U. minor s. l., a Eurasian variable species that includes two currently recognized infraspecific taxa, i.e. subsp. minor and subsp. canescens. Supported by the present nomenclatural study, a coherent taxonomic choice is to consider U. procera as a subspecies of U. minor (not as a heterotypic synonym of U. minor subsp. minor, as recognized by various authors). Based on morphological observations, U. minor subsp. procera can be distinguished from the other two subspecies (subsp. minor and subsp. canescens) by the lower length/width ratio of the leaf blades (1.1–1.6 vs. 1.7–2.5 times longer than wide). Concerning Miller’s U. sativa, its leaves features match those of U. minor subsp. minor, and the two names are here synonymized.

Keywords: morphology, synonymy, typification, Ulmus minor

Full text: PDF (Eng) 1.03M

1. Aiton W. 1789. Hortus Kewensis; or, a catalogue of the plants cultivated in the Royal Botanic Garden at Kew. Vol. 1. London: George Nicol, xxx + 496 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4504
2. Amaral Franco J. do. 1992. Ulmus minor subsp. procera (Salisb.) Franco, comb. nov. Anales del Jardin Botánico de Madrid, 50: 259.
3. Browicz K., Zielinski J. 1982. Ulmus. In: Flora of Turkey. Vol. 7. Ed. P.H. Davis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 645–648.
4. Brullo S., Spampinato G. 1999. Syntaxonomy of hygrophilous woods of the Alno-Quercion roboris. Annali di Botanica (Roma), 57: 133–146. https://doi.org/10.4462/annbotrm-9053
5. Caudullo G., de Rigo D. 2016. Ulmus — elms in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Eds J. San-Miguel-Ayanz, D. de Rigo, G. Caudullo, T. Houston Durrant, A. Mauri. Luxembourg: Publ. Off. EU, pp. 186–188. https://doi.org/10.2760/776635
6. Du Roi J.P. 1772. Die Harbkesche wilde Baumzucht theils Nordamerikanischer und anderer fremder: Teils einheimischer Bäume, Sträucher und Strauchartigen Pflanzen, nach den Kennzeichen der Anzucht, den Eigenschaften und der Benutzung. Vol. 2. Braunschweig: im Verlage de Fürstl. Waisenhaus-Buchhandlung, 512 pp. + Index (unpaged) + Tab. iv–vi. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.139988
7. Eversham B. 2021. Identifying British Elms Ulmus. Version 2.3.1. Wildlife Trust BNC, 138 pp. Available at: https://www.wildlifebcn.org/sites/default/files/2021-07/Complete%20key%20to%20native%20and%20naturalised%20elms.pdf (Accessed 02 July 2025).
8. Fu L.-K., Xin J., Whittemore A. 2003. Ulmaceae. In: Flora of China. Vol. 5. Eds Z.Y. Wu, P.H. Raven, D.Y. Hong. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, pp. 1–19.
9. Gerard [“Gerarde”] J. 1597. The Herball, or, Generall historie of plantes. London: Iohn Norton [Imprinted at London, By Iohn Norton], 1482 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.51606
10. Gerard [“Gerarde”] J. 1633. The Herball, or, Generall historie of plantes. Ed. T. Jonson. London: Adam Islip, Joice Norton and Richard Whitakers. [33 pp. introduction, unpaged] + 1678 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.121658
11. Gil L., Fuentes-Utrilla P., Soto Á., Cervera M.T., Collada C. 2004. English elm is a 2,000-year-old Roman clone. Nature, 431: 1053. https://doi.org/10.1038/4311053a
12. Hudson W. 1762. Flora Anglica. Londini [London]: Impensis Auctoris [self-published]. viii + [8 pp., unpaged] + 536 pp. [+ 22 pp., indexes, unpaged]. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.124863
13. HUH. 2013. Miller, Philip. In: Harvard University Herbaria & Libraries. Index of Botanists. Available at: https://kiki.huh.harvard.edu/databases/botanist_search.php?mode=details&id=143 (Accessed 22 January 2026).
14. Iamonico D., Capotorti C. 2025. Nomenclatural notes on some European elm names (Ulmaceae). Taxon, 74(5): 1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13358
15. Jeffers J.N.R. 1996. Multivariate analysis of a reference collection of elm leaves. Journal of Applied Statistics, 23(6): 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769623946
16. Miller P. 1768. The Gardeners Dictionary. 8^th ed. London: Printed for the author and sold by John and Francis Rivington. Without pagination.
17. Portal to the Flora of Italy. 2025–onward. Available at: https://dryades.units.it/floritaly/index.php (Accessed 22 January 2026).
18. POWO. 2026–onward. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available at: https://powo.science.kew.org/ (Accessed 22 January 2026).
19. Ray J. 1724. Synopsis Methodica Stirpium Britannicarum. 3^rd ed. Londini [London]: Impensis Gulielmi & Joannis Innys Regiae Societatis Typographorum. xvi + 482 pp. + [30 pp., indexes, unpaged]. Available at: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/75077
20. Richens R.H. 1983. Elms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 360 pp.
21. Salisbury R.A. 1796. Prodromus stirpium in horto ad Chapel Allerton vigentium. Londini [London], vii + 422 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.427
22. Sherman-Brotles S.L., Barker W.T., Schultz L.M. 2005. Ulmaceae. In: Flora of North America North of Mexico. Vol. 3. Eds Flora of North America Editorial Committee. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 368–380.
23. Thiers B. 2026–onward [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum. A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. Available at: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih (Accessed 22 January 2026).
24. Thomas P.A., Stone D., La Porta N. 2018. Biological Flora of the British Isles: Ulmus glabra. Journal of Ecology, 106(4): 1724–1766. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12994
25. Thomson S.A., Pyle R.L., Ahyong S.T., Alonso-Zarazaga M., Ammirati J., Araya J.F., and 178 co-authors. 2018. Taxonomy based on science is necessary for global conservation. PLoS Biology, 16(3): e2005075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005075
26. Turland N.J., Wiersema J.H., Barrie F.R., Gandhi K.N., Gravendyck J., Greuter W., Hawksworth D.L., Herendeen P.S., Klopper R.R., Knapp S., Kusber W.-H., Li D.-Z., May T.W., Monro A.M., Prado J., Price M.J., Smith G.F., Zamora Señoret J.C. 2025. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code) [Regnum Vegetabile, vol. 162]. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226839479.001.0001
27. Tutin T.G. 1993. Ulmus. In: Flora Europaea. Vol. 1. 2^nd ed. Eds T.G. Tutin, N.A. Burges, A.O. Chater, J.R. Edmonson, V.H. Heywood, D.M. Moore, D.H. Valentine, S.M. Walters, D.A. Webb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 76.
28. Uotila P. 2011–onward. Ulmaceae. In: Euro+Med Plantbase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. Available at: https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/4412a0fe-627d-46ad-87b9-db12b3b7de72 (Accessed 22 January 2026).
29. Whittemore A.T. 2017. Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa, 297(3): 291–294. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
30. Whittemore A.T., Fuller R.S., Brown B.H., Hahn M., Gog L., Weber J.A., Hipp A.L. 2021. Phylogeny, biogeography, and classification of the elms (Ulmus). Systematic Botany, 46(3): 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364421X16312068417039
31. Wiegrefe S.J., Sytsma K.J., Guries R.P. 1994. Phylogeny of elms (Ulmus, Ulmaceae): Molecular evidence for a sectional classification. Systematic Botany, 19(4): 590–612. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419779
32. Zuo L.-H., Shang A.-Q., Zhang S., Yu X.-Y., Ren Y.-C., Yang M.-S., Wang J.-M. 2017. The first complete chloroplast genome sequences of Ulmus species by de novo sequencing: Genome comparative and taxonomic position analysis. PLoS ONE, 12: e0171264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171264