Carbonic anhydrase, CA (EC 4.2.1.1), is the second most abundant protein in leaves of higher plants after ribu­lose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO), which is represented by three different families. CA plays a pivotal role in supplying CO₂ to RuBisCO and facilitating the hydration of CO₂ to form HCO₃⁻, which is then utilized as a substrate for phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) in C₄- and CAM-plants. Despite the pivotal role of CA in CAM-photosynthesis, there is a paucity of data on its isoforms, activity, and localization in CAM-plants. The objective of this study was to identify and characterize the forms of CA and to determine the level and distribution of CA activity among the soluble proteins of leaves in model CAM-plant Crassula ovata adapted to darkness and light. The level of CA activity in the fraction of soluble proteins varied from 30 to 85 WAU/mg protein depending on the time of day when leaf samples were collected. A notable decline in CA activity in the total leaf fraction of soluble proteins was observed during the transition from the dark to the light phase. A single isoform of the enzyme with a molecular mass of 29 kDa was identified in the extract from leaves of "light" C. ovata using electrophoretic separation in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate after visualization of CA activity by protonography. Two high molecular weight protein complexes exhibiting CA activity were detected in "light" and "dark" leaves by native electrophoresis and protonography methods. The hydratase activity of these complexes in dark-adapted leaves was significantly lower, compared to light-adapted ones. The data obtained indicate a light-dependent alteration in CA activity and its localisation in leaves of C. ovata during the "day-night" cycle.

Keywords: CAM-photosynthesis, carbonic anhydrase, Crassula ovata, protonography

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 346K

1. Anderson L.E., Gatla N., Carol A.A. 2009. Co-localization of P-glycerate kinase, P-ribulokinase, ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and Rubisco activase with CF1 in pea leaf chloroplasts. Plant Science, 177(2): 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.04.008
2. Babadzhanova M.A., Mirzorakhimov A.K., Babadzhanova M.P., Esanalieva S.A. 2010. Developmental pattern in the formation of various multienzyme complexes associated with Benson-Calvin cycle in cotton leaves. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 57(2): 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443710020032
3. Borland A.M., Hartwell J., Weston D.J., Schlauch K.A. Tschaplinski T.J., Tuskan, G.A., Yang X., Cushman J.C. 2014. Engineering crassulacean acid metabolism to improve water-use efficiency. Trends in Plant Science, 19(5): 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.01.006
4. Bradford M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72(1–2): 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
5. Capasso C., De Luca V., Carginale V., Cannio R., Rossi M. 2012. Biochemical properties of a novel and highly thermostable bacterial α-carbonic anhydrase from Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonense YO3AOP1. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, 27(6): 892–897. https://doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2012.703185
6. Ceusters N., Borland A.M., Ceusters J. 2021. How to resolve the enigma of diurnal malate remobilization from the vacuole in plants with crassulacean acid metabolism? New Phytologist, 229: 3116–3124. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17070
7. Cushman J.C., Tillett R.L., Wood J.A., Branco J.A., Schlauch K.A. 2008. Large-scale mRNA expression profiling in the common ice plant, Mesembryanthemum crystallinum, performing C₃ photosynthesis and Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM). Journal of Experimental Botany, 59: 1875–1894. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern008
8. De Luca V., Del Prete S., Supuran C.T., Capasso C. 2015. Protonography, a new technique for the analysis of carbonic anhydrase activity. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, 30(2): 277–282. https://doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2014.917085
9. Del Prete S., De LucaV., Iandolo E., Supuran C.T., Capasso C. 2015. Protonography, a powerful tool for analyzing the activity and the oligomeric state of the γ-carbonic anhydrase identified in the genome of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 23(13): 3747–3750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2015.03.080
10. Del Prete S., Vullo D., De Luca V., Carginale V., Osman S.M., AlOthman Z., Capasso C. 2016. Comparison of the sulfonamide inhibition profiles of the α-, β-and γ-carbonic anhydrases from the pathogenic bacterium Vibrio cholerae. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 26(8): 1941–1946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.03.014
11. DiMario R.J., Clayton H., Mukherjee A., Ludwig M., Moroney J.V. 2017. Plant carbonic anhydrases: structures, locations, evolution, and physiological roles. Molecular Plant, 10: 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2016.09.001
12. Edwards L.J., Patton R.L. 1966. Visualization of carbonic anhydrase activity in polyacrilamide gel. Stain Technology, 41: 333–334. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520296609116335
13. Gontero B., Mulliert G., Rault M., Giudici-Orticoni M.T., Ricard J. 1993. Structural and functional properties of a multi-enzyme complex from spinach chloroplasts: 2. Modulation of the kinetic properties of enzymes in the aggregated state. European Journal of Biochemistry, 217(3): 1075–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18339.x
14. Heyduk K. 2022. Evolution of Crassulacean acid metabolism in response to the environment: past, present, and future. Plant Physiology, 190: 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiac303
15. Huang X., Wang C., Zhao Y., Sun C., Hu D. 2021. Mechanisms and regulation of organic acid accumulation in plant vacuoles. Horticulture Research, 8: 227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00702-z
16. Jebanathirajah J.A., Coleman J.R. 1998. Association of carbonic anhydrase with a Calvin cycle enzyme complex in Nicotiana tabacum. Planta, 204: 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050244
17. Kawamitsu Y., Kosaka K., Abe S., Nose A., Buah J.N. 2002. Regulation of photosynthesis during the light period in CAM plants — evaluation by a gas-phase O₂ electrode and a compensating infrared CO₂ analysis system. Environment Control in Biology, 40(4): 355–364. https://doi.org/ 10.2525/ecb1963.40.355
18. Kimber M.S., Pai E.F. 2000. The active site architecture of Pisum sativum betacarbonic anhydrase is a mirror image of that of alpha-carbonic anhydrases. EMBO Journal, 19(7): 1407–1418. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.7.1407
19. Laemmli U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227(5259): 680–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
20. Lazova G.N., Stemler A.J. 2008. A 160 kDa protein with carbonic anhydrase activity is complexed with rubisco on the outer surface of thylakoids. Cell Biology International, 32(6): 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2008.01.010
21. Loucks M., Ownby J.D. 1978. Effect of pH and metabolic inhibitors on stomatal opening in Crassula argentea. Botanical Gazette, 139(4): 381–384. https://doi.org/10.1086/337014
22. Lüttge U. 2004. Ecophysiology of crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM). Annals of Botany, 93(6): 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch087
23. Makino A., Sakashita H., Hidema J., Mae T., Ojima K., Osmond B. 1992. Distinctive responses of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase and carbonic anhydrase in wheat leaves to nitrogen nutrition and their possible relationships to CO₂-transfer resistance. Plant Physiology, 100(4): 1737–1743. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.100.4.1737
24. Males J., Griffiths H. 2017. Stomatal biology of CAM plants. Plant Physiology, 174(2): 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00114
25. Maren T.H. 1988. The kinetics of HCO₃⁻ synthesis related to fluid secretion, pH control, and CO₂ elimination. Annual Review of Physiology, 50: 695–717. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.50.030188.003403
26. Mattia E., Otto S. 2015. Supramolecular systems chemistry. Nature Nanotechnology, 10(2): 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.337
27. Ming R.R., VanBuren R., Wai C.M., Tang H., Schatz M.C., Bowers J.E., … [63 others] …, Paull R.E., Yu Q. 2015. The pineapple genome and the evolution of CAM photosynthesis. Nature Genetics, 47: 1435–1442. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3435
28. Moroney J.V., Jungnick N., DiMario R.J., Longstreth D. 2013. Photorespiration and carbon concentrating mechanisms: two adaptations to high O₂, low CO₂ conditions. Photosynthesis Research, 117: 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-013-9865-7
29. Nicholson S., Easterby J.S., Powls R. 1987. Properties of a multimeric protein complex from chloroplasts possessing potential activities of NADPH-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and phosphoribulokinase. European Journal of Biochemistry, 162(2): 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb10619.x
30. Ornstein L., Davis B.J. 1964. Disc electrophoresis. II. Method and application to human serum protein. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 121: 404–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb14213.x
31. Osmond C.B. 1978. Crassulacean acid metabolism: a curiosity in context. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 29(1): 379–414. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.002115
32. Rustin P., Meyer C., Wedding R. 1988. The effect of adenine nucleotides on purified phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase from the CAM plant Crassula argentea. Plant Physiology, 88(1): 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.88.1.153
33. Sainis J.K., Harris G.C. 1986. The association of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase with phosphoriboisomerase and phosphoribulokinase. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 139(3): 947–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(86)80269-8
34. Semenihin A.V., Zolotareva O.K. 2015. Carbonic anhydrase activity of integral-functional complexes of thylakoid membranes of spinach chloroplasts. The Ukrainian Biochemical Journal, 87(3): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.15407/ubj87.03.047
35. Sharkey T.D. 2019. Discovery of the canonical Calvin–Benson cycle. Photosynthesis Research, 140(2): 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-018-0600-2
36. Syvash O.O., Mykhaylenko N.F., Zolotareva E.K. 2018. Variation of chlorophyll a to b ratio at adaptation of plants to external factors. The Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University. Series Biology, 3(45): 49–73.
37. Tait M.A., Hick D.S. 2003. Is dimethylsulfoxide a reliable solvent for extracting chlorophyll under field conditions? Photosynthesis Research, 78: 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026045624155
38. Tsuzuki M., Miyachi S., Winter K., Edwards G.E. 1982. Localization of carbonic anhydrase in crassulacean acid metabolism plants. Plant Science Letters, 24(2): 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4211(82)90194-8
39. van Tongerlo E., Trouwborst G., Hogewoning S.W., van Ieperen W., Dieleman J.A., Marcelis L.F.M. 2021. Crassulacean acid metabolism species differ in the contribution of C₃ and C₄ carboxylation to end of day CO₂ fixation. Physiologia Plantarum, 172(1): 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13312
40. von Caemmerer S., Griffiths H. 2009. Stomatal responses to CO₂ during a diel Crassulacean acid metabolism cycle in Kalanchoe daigremontiana and Kalanchoe pinnata. Plant, Cell & Environment, 32(5): 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01951.x
41. Wai C.M., Weise S.E., Ozersky P., Mockler T.C., Michael T. P., VanBuren R. 2019. Time of day and network reprogramming during drought induced CAM photosynthesis in Sedum album. PLoS Genetics, 15(6): e1008209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008209
42. Wellburn A.R. 1994. The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144(3): 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2
43. Winter K., Smith J.A.C. 2022. CAM photosynthesis: the acid test. New Phytologist, 233(2): 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17790
44. Zolotareva O.K., Topchiy N.M., Fediuk O.M. 2023. Biocatalytic carbon dioxide capture promoted by carbonic anhydrase. Biotechnologia Acta, 16(5): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.15407/biotech16.05.005