ISSN 2415-8860 (online), ISSN 0372-4123 (print)
logoUkrainian Botanical Journal
  • 5 of 9
Up
Ukr. Bot. J. 2019, 76(5): 427–433
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj76.05.427
Fungi and Fungi-like Organisms

Distribution and preliminary assessment of a rare fungus Hemileccinum depilatum (Boletales, Basidiomycota) in Ukraine

Heluta V.P.1, Assyov B.2, Hayova V.P.1
Abstract

Hemileccinum depilatum ( Boletales, Basidiomycota) is currently known from Western and Central Europe, the Mediterranean, the Balkan Peninsula, and Asia (Azerbaijan and Turkey). The fungus is rare throughout its range and is included in the Red Lists in several European countries. In Ukraine, the species is known since 2006. Formerly, H. depilatum was found on the South Coast of Crimea, in the Mountain Crimea, Western Forest-Steppe and the Carpathians. The species was recorded only in five localities in three regions of Ukraine: Khmelnytsky, Transcarpathian, and the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. Over the recent years, the fungus has been also reported from the following five regions: Cherkasy, Ivano-Frankivsk, Kyiv, Lviv, and Ternopil. Thus, by now the total number of the species localities increased from 5 to 14. However, the number of records grows due to additional data recently provided from field observations by amateur mycologists, rather than it can be considered as a result of an increasing population trend of the fungus. Undoubtedly, H. depilatum is a rarely occurring species in Ukraine and is to be protected. A preliminary assessment of the species at the national level using the IUCN criteria and categories is provided. Today, the main threat to its existence is collection of the fruit bodies by local population. Therefore, it is proposed to continue searching for new localities of the fungus and to protect those sites at least at the regional level, as well as to provide public outreach, primarily through social networks, which nowadays bring together tens of thousands of amateur mycologists in Ukraine.

Keywords: Boletaceae, Boletus, fungal conservation, IUCN, Hemileccinum impolitum, Leccinum, rare fungus, Xerocomus

Full text: PDF (Eng) 1.87M

References
  1. Ainsworth A.M., Smith J.H., Boddy L., Dentinger B.T.M., Jordan M., Parfitt D., Rogers H.J., Skeates S.J. 2013. Red List of Fungi for Great Britain: Boletaceae. A pilot conservation assessment based on national database records, fruit body morphology and DNA barcoding. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee (Species Status 14), 37 pp.
  2. Akulov O.Yu., Prydiuk M.P. 2007. The preliminary checklist of boletoid fungi of Ukraine. Pagine di Micologia, 27: 117–144.
  3. Assyov B., Denchev C.M. 2015. Boletus depilatus Redeuilh. In: Red data book of the Republic of Bulgaria. Vol. 1. Plants and fungi. Eds D. Peev, A.S. Petrova, M. Anchev, D. Temniskova, C.M. Denchev, A. Ganeva, Ch. Gussev, V. Vladimirov V. Sofia: IBER – BAS & MOEW, p. 776.
  4. Bakker H.C., Noordeloos M.E. 2005. A revision of European species of Leccinum Gray and notes on extralimital species. Persoonia, 18: 511–587.
  5. Berkela Yu.Yu., Pokynchereda V.F. 2015. Zvit pro vykonannya planu zakhodiv z naukovoyi ta naukovo-tekhnichnoyi diyalnosti Karpatskoho biosfernoho zapovidnyka za 2015 r. http://cbr.nature.org.ua/doc/CBR_Zvit-nauka-2015.pdf
  6. Bertault R. 1980. Amanites du Maroc. (Troisième contribution). Bulletin de la Société mycologique de France, 96(3): 271–287.
  7. Binder M., Besl H. 2000. 28S rDNA sequence data and chemo-taxonomical analyses on the generic concept of Leccinum (Boletales). Micologia (Trento): 75–86.
  8. Dahlberg A., Mueller G.M. 2011. Applying IUCN red-listing criteria for assessing and reporting on the conservation status of fungal species. Fungal Ecology, 4(2): 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2010.11.001
  9. Doğan H.H., Aktaş S., Öztürk C., Kaşik G. 2012. Macrofungi distribution of Cocakdere valley (Arslanköy, Mersin). Turkish Journal of Botany, 36: 83–94. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1010-9
  10. Gleb R.Yu. 2016. In: Rehionalni aspekty florystychnykh i faunistychnykh doslidzhen. Materialy Tretoi mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (13–14 travnya 2016 r., smt Putyla). Chernivtsi: Druk Art, pp. 313–315.
  11. Gyosheva M.M., Denchev C.M., Dimitrova E.G., Assyov B., Petrova R.D., Stoichev G.T. 2006. Red List of fungi in Bulgaria. Mycologia Balcanica, 3: 81–87.
  12. IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. Available at: https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/categories-and-criteria
  13. IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee. 2019. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf
  14. Halling R.E., Fechner N., Nuhn M., Osmundson T., Soytong K., Arora D., Binder M., Hibbett D. 2015. Evolutionary relationships of Heimioporus and Boletellus (Boletales), with an emphasis on Australian taxa including new species and new combinations in Aureoboletus, Hemileccinum and Xerocomus. Australian Systematic Botany, 28: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14049
  15. Heluta V.P. 2012. In: Roslynnyi svit u Chervoniy knyzi Ukrayiny: vprovadzhennya Hlobalnoyi stratehiyi zberezhennya roslyn. Materialy II Mizhnarodnoyi naukovoyi konferentsiyi. Kyiv: Palyvoda A.V., pp. 201–204.
  16. Holec J., Beran M. 2006. Červeny seznam hub (makromycetů) Česke republiky. Praha: Přiroda, 282 pp.
  17. Mustafabayli E.H., Aghayeva D.N. 2019. New mushroom records for the mycobiota of Azerbaijan. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 76(4): 356–361. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj76.04.356
  18. Sarkina I.S. 2014a. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov GNBS, 139: 73–78.
  19. Sarkina I.S. 2014b. In: Roslynnyi svit u Chervoniy knyzi Ukrayiny: vprovadzhennya Hlobalnoyi stratehiyi zberezhennya roslyn. Materialy III Mizhnarodnoyi konferentsiyi. Lviv, pp. 187–189.
  20. Sarkina I.S. 2018. Griby znakomye i neznakomye. Spravochnik-opredelitel gribov Kryma. Simferopol: Biznes-Inform, 488 pp.
  21. Šutara J. 2008. Xerocomus s. l. in the light of the present state of knowledge. Czech Mycology, 60(1): 29–62. https://doi.org/10.33585/cmy.60104
  22. Šutara J., Mikšík M., Janda V. 2009. Hřibovité houby. Čeleď Boletaceae a rody Gyrodon, Gyroporus, Boletinus a Suillus. Praha: Academia, 296 pp.
  23. Wu G., Feng B., Xu J., Zhu X.-T., Li Y.-C., Zeng N.K., Hosen I., Yang, Z.L. 2014. Molecular phylogenetic analyses redefine seven major clades and reveal 22 new generic clades in the fungal family Boletaceae. Fungal Diversity, 69(1): 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0283-8
  24. Wu G., Li Y.-Ch., Zhu X.-T., Zhao K., Han L.-H., Cui Y.-Y., Li F., Xu J.-P., Yang Zh.L. 2016. One hundred noteworthy boletes from China. Fungal Diversity, 81(1): 25–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0375-8
  25. Zerova M.Ya., Sosin P.Ye., Rozhenko H.L. 1979. Vyznachnyk hrybiv Ukrayiny. Vol. 5. Bazydiomitsety. Book 2. Boletalni, strobilomitsetalni, trykholomatalni, entolomatalni, rusulalni, aharykalni, hasteromitsety. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 566 pp.