Current state of Ledum palustre populations in seven forest and forest-swamp phytocoenoses of Novhorod-Siversky Polissya is described. Coenopopulations have statistically significant differences and distinct structures in terms of dimension and vitality of plants. In terms of ontogenetic structure and population density, coenopopulations are quite similar. Using complex population indicators, the highest phytocoenotic functioning potential was revealed for coenopopulations from Pinetum (sylvestris) vacciniosum (myrtilli), Pineto (sylvestris)-Betuletum (pendulae) vaccinioso (myrtilli)-ledosum (palustris), and Pinetum (sylvestris) sphagnosum (cuspidati) phytocoenoses.

Keywords: coenopopulations, ontogenetic structure, morphometric analysis, model individuals, vitality analysis

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 744K

1. Andriyenko T.L., Perehrym M.M. Ofitsiyni pereliky rehionalno ridkisnykh roslyn administratyvnykh terytoriy Ukrainy, Kyiv: Alterpress, 2012, 148 pp.
2. Belousov M.V., Tsybukova T.N., Berezovskaya T.P., Tikhonova O.K., Basova E.V., Zeyle L.A., Yusubov M.S. Khimiya rastitelnogo syrya, 2002, 4: 35–38.
3. Dendrosozolohichnyi kataloh pryrodno-zapovidnoho fondu Lisostepu Ukrainy. Ed. S.Yu. Popovych, Kyiv: Ahrar Media Hrup, 2011, 800 pp.
4. Glotov N.V. In: Zhizn populyatsiy v geterogennoy srede, Yoshkar-Ola, 1998, part 1, pp. 146–149.
5. Harper J.L. Population biology of plants, New York; London: Acad. Press, 1977, 592 pp.
6. Kompiuterni metody v silskomu hospodarstvi ta biolohii. Eds O.M. Tsarenko, Yu.A. Zlobin, V.H. Sklyar, O.M. Panchenko, Sumy: Universytet. knyha, 2000, 203 pp.
7. Kovalenko I.M. Ukr. Bot. J., 2005, 62(5): 707–714.
8. Krylova I.L., Prokosheva L.I. Biologicheskaya flora Moskovskoy oblasti, 1995, 10: 174–186.
9. Kuritsyn A.V., Belonogova V.D., Vlasov A.S. Meditsinskiy almanakh, 2011, 5(18): 292–294.
10. Likarski roslyny: Entsyklopedychnyi dovidnyk, Kyiv: Vyd-vo Ukr. entsykloped., 1992, 544 pp.
11. Minarchenko V.M. Likarski sudynni roslyny Ukrainy (medychne ta resursne znachennya), Kyiv: Phytosociocentre, 2005, 241 pp.
12. Minarchenko V.M., Solomakha T.D., Tymchenko I.A. In: Ekolohiya vodno-bolotnykh uhid i torfovyshch, Kyiv: TOV NVP Interservis, 2014, p. 161.
13. Ryzhikova M.A., Gabitova D.M. Vestnik sovremennoy klinicheskoy meditsiny, 2001, 4(1): 42–44.
14. Soroka M.I. RVV NLTU Ukrainy, 2008, 6: 85–91.
15. Stadnytska N.Ye., Komarovska-Porokhnyavets O.Z., Kishchak Kh.Ya., Mykoliv O.B., Lytvyn B.Ya., Konechna R.T., Novikov V.P. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu Lvivska politekhnika, 2011, 70: 111–116.
16. Stolyar I.V. Bezpeka produktiv kharchuvannya ta tekhnolohiya pererobky, 2013, 71(1): 165–170.
17. Telishevska H.Yu., Hrytsyk A.R., Benzel I.L. Aktualni problemy profilaktychnoi medytsyny, 2012, 10: 125–131.
18. Uranov A.A. Biologicheskie nauki, 1975, 2: 7–33.
19. Veretnova O.Yu., Polyakov N.A., Efremov A.A. Khimiya rastitelnogo syria, 2007, 2: 67–72.
20. Zhivotovskiy L.A. Ekologiya, 2001, 1: 3–7.
21. Zhukova L.A. In: Dinamika tsenopopulyatsiy travyanistykh rasteniy, In: Kiev, 1987, pp. 9–19.
22. Zlobin Yu.A. Printsipy i metody izucheniya tsenoticheskikh populyatsyi rastenyi, Kazan: Izd-vo Kazan. univ., 1989, 146 pp.
23. Zlobin Yu.A. Populyatsionnaya ekologiya rasteniy: sovremennoe sostoyanie, tochki rosta, Sumy: Universitet. kniga, 2009, 263 pp.
24. Zlobin Yu.A., Sklyar V.G., Klimenko A.A. Populyatsii redkikh vidov rasteniy: teoreticheskie osnovy i metodika izucheniya, Sumy: Universitet. kniga, 2013, 439 pp.