ISSN 2415-8860 (online), ISSN 0372-4123 (print)
logoUkrainian Botanical Journal
  • 3 of 10
Up
Ukr. Bot. J. 2015, 72(2): 122–134
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj72.02.122
Plant Taxonomy, Geography and Floristics

The range of the morphological features of Brassicaceae s. l.: inflorescence, flower

Ilyinska A.P.
Abstract

The spectra of morphological features of the inflorescence and the flower of plants of three closely related families: Capparaceae, Cleomaceae and Brassicaceae s. str. or Brassicaceae s. l. (alternative view) are investigated. The main attention is paid to the following features of inflorescence: type, branching pattern, the number of flowers in one inflorescence, and the presence (absence) of the bracts. For analyzing the structure of the flower were used mostly features such as: symmetry type of flower, shape, growth pattern and duration of the sepals, shape, size and features of the petals, the structural features of the receptacle and nectaries, androecium construction, structure and features of the gynoecium, and the character of flowering and pollination of the flowers. It was established that in all three families observed the same type inflorescence – raceme. The main directions evolutionary transformation of the raceme of Brassicaceae s. l. were reduction to one flower on one hand, and polymerization (increased number of the flowers in an inflorescence), – on the other. Both modus morphological changes of the raceme observed in Cleomaceae as well as in Brassicaceae s. str. It is supposed that the depletion of the raceme is the result of adaptation of plants to arid and cryophilic conditions of existence. The development of intercalary and bracteate raceme – very typical for Cleomaceae and rare in the Brassicaceae s. str., in the study group of families is probably of secondary origin. Can assume that in the process of evolution the plasticity of the structural elements of the flowers decreased and occurred their oligomerization, which resulted in the unification of morphological features, the most expressive in the Brassicaceae s. str. Different course of the blooming across of the day (predominantly at night in Capparaceae, mostly during the day in Brassicaceae s. str. and at various times of the day in Cleomaceae) is caused by, probably, need of the specific temperature conditions and humidity, as well as adaptation to one or the other pollinators. For Brassicaceae s. l. the most typical are three ways of pollination: a cross, the combined and self-pollination. Cross-pollination in each of the three families is achieved by the development of various structural elements of the flower: in the Caper family and Cleomaceae it is ensures by forming ginofor, androfor or androginofor, and cruciferous – by development of the long stylus of the ovary.

Keywords: Capparaceae, Cleomaceae, Brassicaceae, morphology, inflorescence, flower, flowering, pollination

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 701K

References
  1. Alexander I. Planta, 1952, 41(2): 125–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01928306
  2. Allen R.B. New Zealand J. Bot., 1998, 36(3): 439–452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1998.9512582
  3. Al-Shehbaz I.A. Taxon, 2012b, 61(5): 931–954.
  4. Al-Shehbaz I.A. and co-worker. Flora of North America north of Mexico. N.Y. etc.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010, Vol. 7, pp. 224–746, www.eFloras.org.
  5. Al-Shehbaz I.A. Neotropical Brassicaceae. In: W. Milliken, B. Klitgard, and A. Baracat (2009 onwards). Neotropikey – Interactive key and information resources for flowering plants of the Neotropics, 2012a, http://www.kew.org/science/tropamerica/neotropikey/families/Brassicaceae.htm.
  6. Al-Shehbaz I.A. Syst. Bot., 1977, 2(4): 327–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2418468
  7. Avetisian V.E. Zhizn rasteniy. Ed. A.L. Takhtajan, Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1981, Vol. 5(2), pp. 67–74.
  8. Ball P.W., Heywood V.H., Akeroyd J.R. Cruciferae. In: Flora Europaea, Ed. 2. Eds. T.G. Tutin, N.A. Burges, A.O. Chater et al., Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993, pp. 313–417.
  9. Bentham G., Hooker J.D. Genera plantarum, London: Reeve et Company, 1862, Vol. 1, 454 p.
  10. Bianchi M.B., Gibbs P.E. Revista Brasil. Bot., São Paulo, 2000, 23(4): 395–400.
  11. Brückner C. Bot. Rev., 2000, 66(2), 307 p.
  12. Busch A., Horn S., Mühlhausen A., Mummenhoff K., Zachgo S. Mol. Biol. Evol., 2012, 29(4): 1241–1254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr297
  13. Busch A., Zachgo S. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, 2007, 104(42):16714–16719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705338104
  14. Bush N.A. Flora SSSR, Vol. 8, Moscow; Leningrad: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1939, pp. 14–606
  15. Cane J.H. Pl. Spec. Biol., 2008, 23(3): 152–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.2008.00224.x
  16. Cornejo X. Neotropical Capparaceae. In: W. Milliken, B. Klitgard, and A. Baracat (2009 onwards). Neotropikey – Interactive key and information resources for flowering plants of the Neotropics, 2009, http://www.kew.org/science/tropamerica/neotropikey/families/Capparaceae.htm.
  17. De Candolle A.P. Regni vegetabilis Systema naturale, Parisiis, 1821, Vol. 2, 745 p.
  18. Dorofeev V.I. Novosti sist. vyssh. rast., Vol. 35, 2003, pp. 109–114.
  19. Endress P.K. Int. J. Plant Sci., 1992, 153(3): 106–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/297069
  20. Endress P.K. Int. J. Plant Sci., 1999, 160(6), Suppl., pp. 3–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/314211
  21. Endress P.K. J. Syst. Evol., 2010, 48(4): 225–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-6831.2010.00087.x
  22. Fedorov Al.A., Artiushenko Z.T. Atlas po opisatelnoy morfologii vysshykh rasteniy, Leningrad: Nauka, 1975, 352 c.
  23. Fedorova T.A. Vestn. Tverskogo gos. un-ta. Ser. biol. i ekol., 2008, Vyp. 9, pp. 271–275
  24. Gómez J.M., Perfectti F., Camacho J.P.M. Amer. Nat., 2006, 168(4): 532–545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/507048
  25. Hall J.C., Sytsma K.J., Iltis H.H. Amer. J. Bot., 2002, 89(11): 1826–1842. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.11.1826
  26. Hall J.C., Tisdale T.E., Donohue K., Kramer E.M. Int. J. Plant. Sci., 2006, 167(4): 771–789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/504928
  27. Hedge I. Flora of Turkey. Ed. P.H. Davis, Edinburgh: Univ. Press, 1965, pp. 248–495.
  28. Hedge I., Rechinger K.H. Flora Iranica. K.H. Rechinger, Graz: Acad. Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 1–373.
  29. Heenan P.B. N. Z. J. Bot., 2012, 50(1): 77–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2011.624524
  30. Hegi G. Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa. 3 Aufl. Hrsg. W. Schultze-Motel, Berlin; Hamburg: Parey, 1986, Bd. 4 (1), 598 p.
  31. Horovitz A., Gallil I. Bot. Gaz., 1972, 133(2): 127–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/336625
  32. Ilinska A.P. Ukr. botan. zhurn., 2014, 71(1): 29–35.
  33. Ilinska A.P. Ukr. botan. zhurn., 2015, 72(1): 8–18.
  34. Iltis H.H., Hall J.C., Cochrane T.S., Sytsma K.J. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 2011, 98(1): 28–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3417/2007017
  35. Keighery G.J. Nuytsia, 2002, 14(3): 381–384.
  36. Kers L.E. The families and genera of flowering plants. Eds. K. Kubitzki, C. Bayer, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2003, Vol. 5, pp. 36–56.
  37. Kitashiba H., Nasrallah J.B. Breeding Science, 2014, 64(1): 23–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.64.23
  38. Kotov M.I. Flora evrop. chasti SSSR, T. 4, Leningrad: Nauka, 1979, pp. 30–148.
  39. Medan D., Ponessa G. Pl. Syst. Evol., 2003, 236(3–4): 195–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-002-0241-x
  40. Méndez M., Gómez J.M. Pl. Syst. Evol., 2006, 262(3–4): 225–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-006-0462-5
  41. Nasrallah J.B., Liu P., Sherman-Broyles S., Schmidt R., Nasrallah M.E. Genetics, 2007, 175(4): 1965–1973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.069393
  42. Pax F. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Eds. A. Engler, K. Prantl, Leipzig: Verlag von W. Engelmann, 1891, Teil 3(Abt. 2), pp. 209–236.
  43. Payer J.-B. Traité d’organogenie Comparée de la Fleur: Atlas, Paris: Librairie de Victor Masson, 1857, 154 tabl.
  44. Prantl K. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Eds. A. Engler, K. Prantl, Leipzig: Verlag von W. Engelmann, 1891, Teil 3(Abt. 2), pp. 145–206.
  45. Primo L.M., Machado I.C. Acta Bot. Bras., 2009, 23(3): 764–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062009000300016
  46. Raghavan T.S., Venkatasubban K.R. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B, 1941, 13(2): 109–128.
  47. Rea A.C., Liu P., Nasrallah J.B. J. Experimental Bot., 2010, 61(7): 1897–1906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp393
  48. Rodionova G.B. Filogeniya vyssh. rast., Moscow: Nauka, 1982, pp. 110–111.
  49. Rodionova G.B. Sravnitelnaia anatomiya semian. Ed. A.L. Takhtajan, St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1992, Vol. 4, pp. 191–201.
  50. Sargent R.S. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 2004, 271(1539): 603–608.
  51. Savriama Y., Gómez J.M., Perfectti F., Klingenberg C.P. New Phytol., 2012, 196(3): 945–954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04312.x
  52. Schranz M.E., Dobeš Ch., Koch M.A., Mitchell-Olds T. Amer. J. Bot., 2005, 92(11): 1797–1810. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.11.1797
  53. Sessions R.A. Amer. J. Bot., 1997, 84(9): 1179–1191. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2446041
  54. Sessions R.A., Zambryski P.C. Development, 1995, 121(5): 1519–1532.
  55. Shakarishvili N., Osishvili L. Turk. J. Bot., 2013, 37(4): 682–689.
  56. Sharbel T.F., Voigt M.-L., Corral J.M., Galla G., Kumlehn J., Klukas Ch., Schreiber F., Vogel H., Rotterd B. Plant Cell, 2010, 22(6): 655–671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.072223
  57. Short P.S. Flora of the Darwin Region. Eds. P.S. Short, I.D. Cowie, 2011, Vol. 1, pp. 1–24.
  58. Smyth D.R., Bowman J.L., Meyerowitz E.M. Plant Cell, 1990, 2(8): 755–767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.2.8.755
  59. Snell R., Aarssen L.W. BMC Ecology, 2005, 5(2), 14 p.
  60. Takhtajan A.L. Osnovy evolyutsionnoy morfologii pokrytosemennykh, Moscow; Leningrad: Nauka, 1964, 237 p.
  61. Takhtajan A.L. Sistema i filogeniya tsvetkovykh rasteniy, Moscow; Leningrad: Nauka, 1966, 611 p.
  62. Takhtajan A.L. Flowering plants, Springer Science, Business Media, 2009, 906 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9609-9
  63. Thellung A. Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa, München: J.F. Lehmanns Verlag, 1919, 4(1): 51–482.
  64. Toelken H.R. Flora of South Australia. Ed. 4. Eds. J.P. Jwssop, H.R. Toelken, Vol. 1, Adelaide: South Australian Cover. Print. Division, 1986, pp. 373–375.
  65. Tucker G.C. Flora of North America north of Mexico. N.Y. etc.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010, Vol. 7, pp. 194–198.
  66. Tucker G.C. Neotropical Cleomaceae. In: W. Milliken, B. Klitgard, and A. Baracat (2009 onwards). Neotropikey – Interactive key and information resources for flowering plants of the Neotropics, 2009, http://www.kew.org/science/tropamerica/neotropikey/families/Cleomaceae.htm.
  67. Tucker G.C., Vanderpool S.S. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Edit. comm, N.Y. etc.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010, Vol. 7, pp. 199–223.
  68. Vasilchenko I.T. Zhizn rasteniy / Pod red. A.L. Takhtadzhiana, Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1981, Vol. 5(2), pp. 64–67
  69. Zapata T.R. Acta Bot. Venez., 2006, 29(2): 315–334.
  70. Zhang M., Tucker G.C. Flora of China. Eds. C.Y. Wu, P.H. Raven, D.Y. Hong, Beijing: Sc. Press, St. Louis: Missouri Bot. Gard. Press, 2008a, Vol. 7, pp. 433–450.
  71. Zhang M., Tucker G.C. Flora of China. Eds. C.Y. Wu, P.H. Raven, D.Y. Hong, Beijing: Sc. Press, St. Louis: Missouri Bot. Gard. Press, 2008b, Vol. 7, pp. 429–432.
  72. Zhou T.Y., Lu L.L., Yang G., Al-Shehbaz I.A. Flora of China. Vol. 8. Eds. Zh.G. Wu, P.H. Raven, Beijing: Sc. Press, St. Louis: Missouri Bot. Gard. Press, 2001, pp. 1–193.