ISSN 2415-8860 (online), ISSN 0372-4123 (print)
logoUkrainian Botanical Journal
  • 1 of 19
Up
Ukr. Bot. J. 2013, 70(3): 289–307
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj70.03.289
Vegetation Science, Ecology, Conservation

Families and orders of angiosperms of the flora of Ukraine: a pragmatic classification and placement in the phylogenetic system

Mosyakin S.L.
Abstract

The article provides a discussion of principles of high-rank classification of angiosperms from the viewpoint of a new vision of the angiosperm phylogeny based on molecular phylogenetic and traditional data. It is argued that recognition of both monophyletic and paraphyletic taxa should be recommended at the supraordinal levels. Angiosperms are recognized as a division Magnoliophyta, with three classes, Magnoliopsida (basal angiosperms, with subclasses Nymphaeidae and Magnoliidae), Liliopsida (monocots, with subclasses Alismatidae, Liliidae, and Commelinidae), and Rosopsida (eudicots, with subclasses Ranunculidae, Hamamelidae, Rosidae, Caryophyllidae, and Asteridae). A comparison table is provided showing correspondence of these taxa and units recognized by other recent systems (APG III, 2009; Chase & Reveal, 2009, Takhtajan, 2009; Shipunov, 2013). A synopsis of families and orders of angiosperms occurring in Ukraine (native and widely cultivated plants) contains 174 recognized families placed in 70 orders. In cases of different circumscription of families and orders, comments are provided in favor of the adopted circumscription. The orders and families recognized here are mainly more narrowly circumscribed than those in the APG system.

Keywords: angiosperms, flowering plants, system, phylogeny, nomenclature, flora of Ukraine, Angiosperm Phylogeny Group

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 213K

References
  1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG). An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 1998, 85, pp. 531–553. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992015
  2. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II (APG II). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linnean Soc., 2003, 141, pp. 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x
  3. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III (APG III). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III, Bot. J. Linnean Soc., 2009, 161, pp. 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x
  4. Barker W.R., Nesom G.L., Beardsley P.M., Fraga N.S. Phytoneuron, 2012, 2012-39: 1–60.
  5. Borhidi A. Acta Botanica Hungarica, 2007, 49(3–4), pp. 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1556/ABot.49.2007.3-4.5
  6. Bremer B., Eriksson T. Int. J. Plant Sci., 2009, 170, pp. 766–793. https://doi.org/10.1086/599077
  7. Brummitt R.K. Taxon, 1997, 46, pp. 723–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/1224478
  8. Brummitt R.K. Taxon, 2002, 51, pp. 31–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1554961
  9. Brummitt R.K. Taxon, 2003, 52, pp. 803–804. https://doi.org/10.2307/3647353
  10. Brummitt R.K. Taxon, 2006, 55, pp. 268–269. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065576
  11. Buerki S., Lowry II P.P., Alvarez N., Razafimandimbison S.G., Küpfer P., Callmander M.W. Plant Ecology and Evolution, 2010, 143, pp. 148–159. https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2010.437
  12. Chase M.W., Reveal J.L. Bot. J. Linnean Soc., 2009, 161, pp. 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.01002.x
  13. Chase M.W., Reveal J.L., Fay M.F. Bot. J. Linnean Soc., 2009, 161, pp. 132–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00999.x
  14. Christenhusz M.J.M., Reveal J.L., Farjon A., Gardner M.F., Mill R.R., Chase M.W. Phytotaxa, 2011, 19, pp. 55–70. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.19.1.3
  15. Christenhusz M.J.M., Zhang Xian-Chun, Schneider H. Phytotaxa, 2011, 19, pp. 7–54. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.19.1.2
  16. Cronquist A. The evolution and classification of flowering plants, Bronx, New York: New York Botanical Garden, 1988, viii + 555 p.
  17. Diggs G.M., Lipscomb B.L. Sida, 2002, 20, pp. 647–674.
  18. Doweld A.B. Prosyllabus Tracheophytorum: tentamen systematis plantarum vascularium, Moscow: GEOS, 2001, LXXX + 110 p.
  19. Ebach M.C., Williams D.M., Morrone J.J. Taxon, 2006, 55, pp. 831–832. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065678
  20. Ena A.V. Prirodnaya flora Krymskogo poluostrova, Simferopol: N. Orianda, 2012, 232 p.
  21. Fitch W.M., Ayala F.J. (eds.). Tempo and mode in evolution: genetics and paleontology 50 years after Simpson, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1995, x + 326 p.
  22. Gould S.J., Eldredge N. Paleobiology, 1977, 3, pp. 115–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300005224
  23. Grant V. Amer. J. Bot., 2003, 90, pp. 1263–1270. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.9.1263
  24. Haston E., Richardson J.E., Stevens P.F., Chase M.W., Harris D.J. Taxon, 2007, 56, pp. 7–12.
  25. Haston E., Richardson J.E., Stevens P.F., Chase M.W., Harris D.J. Bot. J. Linnean Soc., 2009, 161, pp. 128–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.01000.x
  26. Heywood V.H., Brummitt R.K., Culham A., Seberg O. (eds.) Flowering plant families of the world, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2007, 424 p.
  27. Holynski R.B. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 2011, 6, pp. 525–534.
  28. Hörandl E. Taxon, 2006, 55, pp. 564–570. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065631
  29. Hörandl E. Taxon, 2007, 56, pp. 1–5.
  30. Hörandl E., Stuessy T.F. Taxon, 2010, 59, pp. 1641–1653.
  31. Judd W.S., Campbell C.S., Kellog E.A., Stevens P.F. Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach, Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 1999, xvi + 464 p.
  32. Judd W.S., Campbell C.S., Kellogg E.A., Stevens P.F., Donoghue M.J. Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach, Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 2007, 565 p.
  33. Kim Joo-Hwan, Kim Dong-Kap, Forest F., Fay M.F., Chase M.W. Ann. Bot., 2010, 106, pp. 775–790.
  34. Krasilov V.A. Problemy filogenii i sistematiki: Materialy simpoz., Vladivostok, 1969, pp. 12–30.
  35. Mabberley D.J. Mabberley’s plant-book. A portable dictionary of plants, their classifications, and uses, London: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 1040 p.
  36. Manns U., Anderberg A.A. Willdenowia, 2009, 39, pp. 49–54. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.39.39103
  37. Mayr E., Bock W.J. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research, 2002, 40, pp. 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0469.2002.00211.x
  38. Mosyakin S.L. Vid i vidoobrazovanie u rasteniy: fitoeydologicheskie vzglyady M.V. Klokova i sovremennost, Kiev: In-t botaniki im. N.G. Kholodnogo NAN Ukrainy, 2008, 72 p.
  39. Mosyakin S.L., Fedoronchuk M.M. Vascular plants of Ukraine: A nomenclatural checklist, Kiev, 1999, xxiv + 346 p.
  40. Mosyakin S.L., Tyshchenko O.V. Ukr. botan. zhurn., 2010, 67(6): 802–817.
  41. Nordal I., Stedje B. Taxon, 2005, 54, pp. 5–6. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065296
  42. Podani J. Synbiol. Hungar., 2010a, 6, pp. 1–42.
  43. Podani J. Taxon, 2009, 58, pp. 1049–1053.
  44. Podani J. Taxon, 2010b, 59, pp. 1011–1015.
  45. Rasnitsyn A.P. Tempy evolyutsii i evolyutsionnaya teoriya (gipoteza adaptivnogo kompromissa). In: Evolyutsiya i biotsenoticheskie krizisy, Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 46–64.
  46. Rasnitsyn A.P. Tr. Russk. entomol. ob-va, Saint-Petersburg, 2002, Vol. 73, pp. 1–108.
  47. Reveal J.L. Kew Bulletin, 2011, 66, pp. 5–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-011-9259-y
  48. Reveal J.L. Phytoneuron, 2012, 2012, 37, pp. 1–221.
  49. Reveal J.L. Phytotaxa, 2010, 6, pp. 1–402. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.6.1.1
  50. Reveal J.L., Chase M.W. Phytotaxa, 2011, 19, pp. 71–134. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.19.1.4
  51. Seberg O., Petersen G., Davis J.I., Pires J.C., Stevenson D.W., Chase M.W., Fay M.F., Devey D.S., Jørgensen T., Sytsma K.J., Pillon Y. Amer. J. Bot., 2012, 99, pp. 875–889. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100468
  52. Shipunov A.B. 2013. Systema angiospermarum. Version 5.8, January 3, 2013. <http://herba.msu.ru/shipunov/ang/current/syang.pdf> Accessed 24 January 2013
  53. Shipunov A.B. Zhurn. obshch. biol., 2003, 64(6): 499–507.
  54. Stace C.A. Watsonia, 2010, 28, pp. 103–122.
  55. Stevens P.F. (2001–onwards) Angiosperm phylogeny website, version 12, June 2008 – onwards. Available at http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/
  56. Stuessy T.F. Aliso, 1997, 15, pp. 113–124.
  57. Stuessy T.F. Taxon, 2004, 53, pp. 3–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135484
  58. Stuessy T.F. Taxon, 2010, 59, pp. 689–693.
  59. Stuessy T.F., König C. Taxon, 2009, 58, pp. 347–348.
  60. Takhtajan A. Flowering plants, Berlin: Springer Verlag (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.), 2009, xlvi + 872 p.
  61. Takhtajan A.L. Diversity and classification of flowering plants, New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1997, 663 p.
  62. Takhtajan A.L. Sistema magnoliofitov, Leningrad: Nauka, 1987, 439 p.
  63. Tang Yan-Cheng, Lu An-Ming. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 2005, 43, pp. 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1360/aps050014
  64. Thorne R.F., Reveal J.L. Bot. Rev., 2007, 73, pp. 67–181. https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2007)73[67:AUCOTC]2.0.CO;2
  65. Timonin A.K., Sokolov D.D., Shipunov A.B. Sistematika vysshikh rasteniy. In: Botanika, Moscow: Izdat. tsentr Akademiya, 2009, Vol. 4, kn. 2, 352 p.
  66. Wu Zheng-Yi, Lu An-Ming, Tang Yan-Cheng, Chen Zhi-Duan, Li De-Zhu. Acta Phytotaxonoica Sinica, 2002, 40, pp. 289–322.
  67. Zander R.H. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 2007, 94, pp. 691–709. https://doi.org/10.3417/0026-6493(2007)94[690:NESFCR]2.0.CO;2
  68. Zander R.H. Taxon, 2008, 57, pp. 1182–1188.