ISSN 2415-8860 (online), ISSN 0372-4123 (print)
logoUkrainian Botanical Journal
  • 1 of 7
Up
Ukr. Bot. J. 2021, 78(1): 3–22
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj78.01.003
Plant Taxonomy, Geography and Floristics

Species of the genus Epilobium (Onagraceae) in plant communities in Ukraine

Fedoronchuk M.M., Klimovych N.B.
Abstract

To assess the coenotic peculiarities of species of the genus Epilobium (Onagraceae), in particular their coenotic amplitudes in the syntaxa of vegetation of Ukraine, 986 relevés from literature sources were analyzed. The names of syntaxa are provided in accordance with the Prodromus of the vegetation of Ukraine. Species of the genus Epilobium are widely represented in many plant communities and participate in the formation of natural, semi-natural and ruderal coenoses, where they are often diagnostic or characteristic species of associations, alliances, orders and classes of vegetation, or only present in their floristic composition. Epilobium species are present in 28 classes, which is evidence of their broad coenotic amplitudes and representation in different vegetation types: wetland, grassland, halophytic, forest, shrubs, chasmophytic, alpine, and anthropogenic (synanthropic). The widest coenotic amplitudes were revealed in such species as: E. hirsutum, E. palustre, E. angustifolium, E. parviflorum, E. tetragonum, E. montanum, E. alsinifolium, and E. collinum. According to the range of coenotic amplitude, all species can be subdivided into three groups: hemistenotopic, which occur within one class (E. adenocaulon, E. dodonaei, E. lamyi, E. nutans), hemi-eurytopic (within two or three classes) – E. alpestre, E. roseum, and eurytopic (within more than three classes) – E. alsinifolium, E. angustifolium, E. collinum, E. hirsutum, E. montanum, E. palustre, E. parviflorum, E. tetragonum. As for participation of species in the coenosis, the vast majority of them are assectators, and only a small portion can be temporary edificators (in some groups, at certain successive stages of vegetation development: E. angustifolium). Plants of Epilobium species can reproduce rapidly, both vegetatively and by seeds, which promotes their active colonization of new habitats. However, they usually do not tolerate increased shading and coenotic competition with other plant species, so their strategy is mainly ruderal.

Keywords: coenoflora, Epilobium, floristic classification, plant communities, syntaxon, Ukraine

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 538K

References
  1. Andrienko T.L., Onyshchenko V.A. 2015. Biological systems, 7(2): 211–221.
  2. Bagrikova N.A. 2004. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1(21): 3–186.
  3. Bagrikova N.A. 2011. Chornomorski Botanical Journal, 7(3): 267–275. https://doi.org/10.14255/2308-9628/11.73/6
  4. Bayrak O.M., Didukh Ya.P. 1996. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 2(2): 37–45.
  5. Bilyk R.G., Didukh Ya.P. 1999. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 56(2): 144–149.
  6. Biodiversity of Cheremosh National Park. 2015. Ed. I.I. Chornei. Chernivtsi: Druk Art, 248 pp.
  7. Chornei I.I., Budzhak V.V., Yakushenko D.M., Korzhyk B.P., Solomakha V.A., Sorokan J.I., Tokarjuk A.I., Solomakha T.D. 2005. Natsionalnyi pryrodnyi park "Vyzhnytskyi". Roslynnyi svit. Kyiv: Phitosociocenter, 248 pp.
  8. Constantin D., Coste A., Mircea T. 2013. Epilobium sp. (Willow Herb): micropropagation and production of secondary metabolites. Biotechnology for Medicinal Plants: 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29974-2_6
  9. Danylyk I.M., Borsukevych L.M., Sosnovs'ka S.V. 2014. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 71(2): 209–213. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj71.02.209
  10. Dubyna D.V., Ennan A.A., Dzyuba T.P., Vakarenko L.P., Shykhaleeva T.M. 2017. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 74(6): 562–573. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj74.06.562
  11. Dubyna D.V., Dvoretsky T.V., Dzyuba T.P., Zhmud O.I., Tymoshenko P.A. 2001. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1(17): 42–53.
  12. Dubyna D.V., Dzyuba Y.P., Zhmud O.I., Tymoshenko P.A., Shelyag-Sosonko Yu.R., Solomakha I.V. 2002. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1(18): 3–14.
  13. Dubyna D.V., Dzyuba T.P. 2014. Rastitelnost Rossii, 25: 13–29.
  14. Dubyna D.V., Dzyuba T.P., Yemelyanova S.M. 2014. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 71(3): 263–274. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj71.03.263
  15. Dubyna D.V., Dzyuba T.P., Yemelyanova S.M., Bahrikova N.O., Borysova O.V., Borsukevych L.M., Vynokurov D.S., Hapon S.V., Hapon Yu.V., Davydov D.A., Dvoretskyi T.V., Didukh Ya.P., Zhmud O.I., Kozyr M.S., Konishchuk V.V., Kuzemko A.A., Pashkevych N.A., Ryff L.E., Solomakha V.A., Felbaba-Klushyna L.M., Fitsaylo T.V., Chorna H.A., Chorney I.I., Shelyah-Sosonko Yu.R., Yakushenko D.M. 2019. Prodromus roslynnosti Ukrainy. Eds. D.V. Dubyna, T.P. Dzyuba. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 784 pp.
  16. Dubyna D.V., Zhmud O.I. 2018. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 75(4): 373–383. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj75.04.373
  17. Dzyuba T.P. 1996. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 3: 92–104.
  18. Fedoronchuk M.M., Klimovych N.B. 2020. Chornomorski Botanical Journal, 16(1): 55–61. https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu1990-553x/2020-16-1-3
  19. Gomlya L.M. 2005. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1(22): 3–186.
  20. Goncharenko I.V. 2000. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1(16): 117–131.
  21. Gorelov O.O. 1997. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 2(7): 48–68.
  22. Khomyak I.V. 2016. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 73(3): 239–254. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj73.03.239
  23. Konogray V. 2014. Visnyk Lvivs'koho universytetu. Series Biologichna, 67: 156–172.
  24. Kovalenko O.O. 2014a. Zapovidna sprava, 1(20): 27–32.
  25. Kovalenko A.A. 2014b. Botanicheskiy Zhurnal, 99(1): 34–60.
  26. Kozak M.I. 2011. Naukovi zapysky Ternopil'skoho nationalnoho pedagogichnoho universytetu. Series Biologia, 1(6): 12–19.
  27. Kuzemko A.A. 1999. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 3(14): 122–139.
  28. Kuzemko A.A. 2011. Biologia ta ekologia, 119: 59–69.
  29. Kuzemko A.A., Chorna H.A. 2002. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1(18): 15–31.
  30. Kuziarin O.T. 2011a. Naukovi zapysky derzhavnoho pryrodnychoho muzeju, 27: 109–118.
  31. Kuziarin O.T. 2011b. Naukovi osnovy zberezhennia biotychnoi riznomanitnosti, 2(9): 181–206.
  32. Kuz' I.A. 2013. Chornomorski Botanical Journal, 9(2): 214–225. https://doi.org/10.14255/2308-9628/13.92/7
  33. Levon A.F. 1996. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1: 78–87.
  34. Levon A.F. 1997. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1(6): 75–81.
  35. Lyubchenko V.M., Olefirenko V.V., Strygun A.V. 1997. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 21(7): 28–38.
  36. Lukash O.B. 2010. Flora sudynnykh roslyn skhidnoho Polissia. Kyiv: Fitosociotsenter, 220 pp.
  37. Makhynia L.M. 2015. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 72(4): 310–324. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj72.04.310
  38. Makhynia L.M. 2016. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsional'noho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Series Biologia, 27: 31–38.
  39. Mosyakin S.L., Fedoronchuk M.M., 1999. Vascular plants of Ukraine. A nomenclatural checklist. Kyiv, 345 pp. + xxiii.
  40. Mosyakin S.L., de Lange P.J., Antonenko S.I., Klimovych N.B. 2020. Types and other historical specimens of Allan and Richard Cunningham's taxa of Epilobium and Fuchsia (Onagraceae) from New Zealand in the Turczaninow Herbarium at the National Herbarium of Ukraine (KW). Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 77(4): 249–269. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj77.04.249
  41. Mucina L., Bültmann H., Dierßen K., Theurillat J.-P., Raus T., Čarni A., Šumberová K., Willner W., Dengler J., Gavilán García R., Chytrý M., Hájek M., Di Pietro R., Iakushenko D., Pallas J., Daniëls F.J.A., Bergmeier E., Santos Guerra A., Ermakov N., Valachovič M., Schaminée J.H.J., Lysenko T., Didukh Y.P., Pignatti S., Rodwell J.S., Capelo J., Weber H.E., Solomeshch A., Dimopoulos P., Aguiar C., Hennekens S.M., Tichý L. 2016. Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Applied Vegetation Science, 19 (Suppl. 1): 3–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12257
  42. Natsionalnyi katalog biotopiv Ukrainy. 2018. Eds A.A. Kuzemko A.A., Ya.P. Didukh, V.A. Onyshchenko, Y. Sheffer. Kyiv: FOP Klymenko, 442 pp.
  43. Olefirenko V.V. 1997. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1(1): 51–56.
  44. Onyshchenko V.A. 2007. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu, vyp. 343, Biologia: 130–147.
  45. Onyshchenko V.A., Andrienko T.L. 2015. Visnyk Lvivs'koho universytetu, 69: 74–80.
  46. Onyshchenko V.A., Andrienko T.L., Priadko O.I. 2016. Biological systems, 8(1): 98–107. https://doi.org/10.31861/biosystems2016.01.098
  47. Phytodiversity of the Ukrainian Polissia and its conservation. 2006. Ed. T.L. Andrienko. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre, 316 pp.
  48. Phytoriznomanittia natsionalnykh pryrodnykh parkiv Ukrainy. 2003. Eds T.L. Andrienko, V.A. Onyshchenko. Kyiv: Naukovyi svit, 243 pp.
  49. Polovyi Ye.V., Didukh Ya.P. 2014. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 71(6): 647–659. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj71.06.647
  50. Prots B., Kagalo A. (Eds.). 2012. Catalogue of habitat types of the Ukrainian Carpathians and Transcarpathian Lowland. Lviv: Mercator, 294 pp.
  51. Raven P.H., Raven T.E. 1976. The genus Epilobium in Australasia: A systematic and evolutionary study.i>New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research Bulletin [Wellington: Government Printer], 216: 1–321.
  52. Ralo V.M. 2010. Naukovi osnovy zberezhennya biotychnoi riznomanitnosti, 1(8): 125–172.
  53. Shevchyk V.L., Polishko O.D. 2000. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1(16): 67–89.
  54. Shevchyk V.L., Bakalina L.V., Solomakha V.A. 1996a. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 2(2): 73–88.
  55. Shevchyk V.L., Solomakha V.A., Voytyuk Yu.O. 1996b. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series B, 1(4): 3–119.
  56. Shums'ka N.V. 2013. Chornomorski Botanical Journal, 9(3): 330–348. https://doi.org/10.14255/2308-9628/13.93/2
  57. Solomakha V.A., Kondratyuk I.M., Kucheryava L.F., Shevchyk V.L. 1996. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 2(2): 21–36.
  58. Solomakha V.A., Shelyag-Sosonko Yu.R. 1996. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 2(1): 28–40.
  59. Solomakha I.V., Senchylo O.O., Kolot O.M., Voityuk B.J. 1997. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 2(7): 80–88.
  60. Solomakha V.A., Yakushenko D.M., Kramarets V.O., Milkina L.I., Voronzov D.P., Vorobjov E.O., Voityuk B.Yu., Vinichenko T.S., Kokhanets M.I., Solomakha I.V., Solomakha T.D. 2004. Natsionalnyi pryrodnyi park "Skolivski Beskydy". Roslynnyi svit. Kyiv: Fitosotsiocenter, 240 pp.
  61. Sosnovs'ka S.V., Danylyk I.M. 2013. Biological systems, 5(3): 359–364.
  62. Sypaylova L.M., Shelyag-Sosonko Yu.R. 1996. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 1: 28–40.
  63. Thompson J. 1990. Onagraceae. In: George A.S. (ed.). Flora of Australia, vol. 18: Podostemaceae to Combretaceae. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, pp. 215–243.
  64. Tyshchenko O.V. 1998. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 2(11): 26–37.
  65. Tyshchenko O.V. 1999. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series A, 3(14): 36–57.
  66. Vasheniak Yu.A. 2013. Biological systems, 5(2): 210–219.
  67. Vacheniak Yu.A., Didukh Ya.P. 2011. Biological systems, 3(4): 356–369.
  68. Vorobyov Ye.O., Balashov L.S., Solomakha V.A. 1997. Ukrainskyi phytocenotychnyi zbirnyk. Series B, 1(8): 1–128.