The article is the first part of a nomenclatural synopsis of the family Fabaceae in the flora of Ukraine. In the process of preparation of the monographic treatment of the family for the Flora of Ukraine series, the taxonomic composition of the family in Ukraine has been revised. According to updated information, Fabaceae is represented in Ukraine by 379 species (including widely cultivated and escaped ones) belonging to 69 genera, or up to 430 species, with those registered as cultivated in gardens and parks. In this treatment, the traditional subdivision of Fabaceae into three subfamilies (Caesalpinioideae DC., Mimosoideae DC. and Faboideae) is accepted for pragmatic considerations, but with new circumscriptions of tribes and genera following new morphological and molecular phylogenetic data. A synopsis of representatives of subfamilies Caesalpinoideae and Mimosoideae, plus some (early-branching) tribes of Faboideae, is provided, with nomenclatural citations, types, and main synonyms.

Keywords: Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae, Faboideae, system, phylogeny, nomenclature, Ukraine

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 650K

1. APG IV (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linnean Soc., 2016, 181(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385
2. Broughton W.J., Hernández G., Blair M., Beebe S., Gepts P., Vanderleyden J. Beans (Phaseolus spp.) – model food legumes. Plant Soil, 2003, 252: 55–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024146710611
3. Bruneau A., Mercure M., Lewis G.P., Herendeen P.S. Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes. Botany (Canada), 2008, 86: 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1139/B08-058
4. Candolle A. de. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 2. Parisiis [Paris]: Sumptibus Sociorum Treuttel et Würtz, 1825. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.286
5. Cardoso D., Pennington R.T., Queiroz L.P. de, Boatwright J.S., Van Wyk B.-E., Wojciechowski M.F., Lavin M. Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes. S. African J. Bot., 2013, 89: 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2013.05.001
6. Doyle J.J., Luckow M.A. The Rest of the Iceberg. Legume diversity and evolution in a phylogenetic context. Plant Physiology, 2003, 131: 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.018150 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12644643 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1540290
7. Delgado-Salinas A., Bibler R., Lavin M. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): A recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot., 2006, 31(4): 779–791. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364406779695960
8. Delgado-Salinas A., Turley T., Richman A., Lavin M. Phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated and species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae). Syst. Bot., 1999, 23: 438–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419699
9. Doyle J.J, Chappill J.A., Bailey C.D., Kajita T. Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of legumes: evidence from rbcL sequences and nonmolecular data. In: Advances in Legume Systematics. Eds P. Herendeen, A. Bruneau. Part 9. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Garden, 2000, pp. 1–20.
10. Doyle J.J., Doyle J.L., Ballaenger A., Dickson E.E., Kajita T., Ohashi H.A. Phylogeny of the chloroplast gene rbcL in the Leguminosae: taxonomic correlations and insights into the evolution of nodulation. Amer. J. Bot., 1997, 84: 541–554. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446030 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21708606
11. Gepts P. Origin and evolution of common bean: past events and recent trends. HortScience, 1998, 33: 1124–1130.
12. Gepts P., Papa R., Coulibaly S., Gonzălez-Mejía A., Pasquet R. Wild legume diversity and domestication – Insights from molecular methods. In: Wild legumes. Proceedings of the 7th MAFF International Workshop on Genetic Resources. Ed. D. Vaughan. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Agrobiological Resources, 1999, pp. 19–31.
13. Gonzălez-Mejía A., Wong A., Delgado-Salinas A., Papa R., Gepts P. Assessment of Inter Simple Sequence Repeat Markers to differentiate sympatric wild and domesticated populations of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Crop Science, 2005, 45: 606–615. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0606
14. Hu J.-M., Lavin M., Wojciechowski M., Sanderson M.J. Phylogenetic systematics of the tribe Millettieae (Leguminosae) based on chloroplast trnK/matK sequences and its implications for evolutionary patterns in Papilionoideae. Amer. J. Bot., 2000, 87: 418–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656638 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10719003
15. Kajita T., Ohashi H., Tateishi Y., Bailey C.D., Doyle J.J. rbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and allies. Syst. Bot., 2001, 26: 515–536.
16. Käss E., Wink M. Molecular evolution of the Leguminosae: Phylogeny of the three subfamilies based on rbcL sequences. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 1996, 24: 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-1978(96)00032-4
17. Lavin M., Eshbaugh E., Hu J.-M., Mathews S., Sharrock R.A. Monophyletic subgroups of the tribe Millettieae (Leguminosae) as revealed by phytochrome nucleotide sequence data. Amer. J. Bot., 1998, 85: 412–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446334
18. Lavin M., Herendeen P.S., Wojciechowski M.F. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the Tertiary. Syst. Biol., 2005, 54: 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150590947131 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16085576
19. Lavin M., Sousa M.S. Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of the tribe Robinieae. Syst. Bot. Monographs, 1995, 45: 1–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/25027850
20. Lewis G., Schrire B., Mackinder B., Lock M. (eds). Legumes of the world. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 2005.
21. LPWG [Legume Phylogeny Working Group]. Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21^st century: Progress, prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades. Taxon, 2013, 62: 217–248. https://doi.org/10.12705/622.8
22. LPWG [Legume Phylogeny Working Group]. A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny. Taxon, 2017, 66(1): 44–77. https://doi.org/10.12705/661.3
23. McMahon M.M., Sanderson M.J. Phylogenetic supermatrix analysis of GenBank sequences from 2228 papilionoid legumes. Syst. Biol., 2006, 55: 818–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600999150 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17060202
24. Magallón S.A., Sanderson M.J. Angiosperm divergence times: The effect of genes, codon positions, and time constraints. Evolution, 2005, 59: 1653–1670. https://doi.org/10.1554/04-565.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16329238
25. Pennington R.T., Lavin M., Ireland H., Klitgaard B., Preston J., Hu J.-M. Phylogenetic relationships of basal papilionoid legumes based upon sequences of the chloroplast intron trnL. Syst. Bot., 2001, 26: 537–556.
26. Polhill R.M., Sousa M. Robinieae. In: Advances in legume systematics. Eds R.M. Polhill, P.H. Raven. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 1981, pp. 283–288.
27. Ravi V., Khurana J.P., Tyagi A.K., Khurana P. Rosales sister to Fabales: Towards resolving the rosid puzzle. Molec. Phylogen. Evol., 2007, 44: 488–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.11.014 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17196401
28. Stevens P.F. (2001–onwards). Angiosperm Phylogeny Website, available at http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/Takhtajan A. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1997, 663 pp.
29. Wikström N., Savolainen V., Chase M.W. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 2001, 268: 2211–2220. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1782 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11674868 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1088868
30. Wojciechowski M.F. Reconstructing the phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae): an early 21^st century perspective. In: Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics. Eds B.B. Klitgaard, A. Bruneau. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 2003, pp. 5–35.
31. Wojciechowski M.F., Lavin M., Sanderson M.J. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Amer. J. Bot., 2004, 91(11): 1846–1862. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.11.1846 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21652332
32. Wojciechowski M.F., Sanderson M.J., Steele K.P., Liston A. Molecular phylogeny of the "temperate herbaceous tribes" of papilionoid legumes: a supertree approach. In: Advances in legume systematics. Part 9. Eds P.S. Herendeen, A. Bruneau. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 2000, pp. 277–298.