ISSN 2415-8860 (online), ISSN 0372-4123 (print)
logoUkrainian Botanical Journal
  • 9 of 11
Up
Ukr. Bot. J. 2016, 73(2): 178–184
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj73.02.178
Fungi and Fungi-like Organisms

The evolution of sporophore in Reticulariaceae (Myxomycetes)

Leontyev D.V.
Abstract

Recent molecular studies have clarified the phylogenetic relations within the family Reticulariaceae (Myxomycetes, Myxogastrea), allowing to reconstruct the ways of the morphological evolution within the family. We conclude, that the general tendency of the sporophore evolution in Reticulariaceae was the transformation of the stalked forms to the sessile ones, followed by the development of the metameric sporophores, called pseudoaethalia and aethalia, from the separate sporocarps. The common ancestor of the family was similar to Alwisia lloydiae having stalked sporocarps and tubular capillitium. At least four evolutionary lineages originated form this ancestor: 1) Alwisia → Tubifera, 2) Alwisia → Rigidotubula (and probably Siphoptychium), 3) Alwisia → (Lycogala) → Thecotubifera, 4) Alwisia → Lycogala → Reticularia. In each of these branches, the processes like a loss of stalks, transition from spherical to elongated sporothecae, transformation of solitary sporocarps to grouped ones, a loss of capillitium and formation of pseudocapillitium, have occurred independently. Therefore, the type of the fruiting body, and presence of capillitium or pseudocapillitium, cannot be considered as sufficient criteria for separating myxomycete genera.

Keywords: 18S rDNA, aethalium, capillitium, convergence, paralellism, phylogeny, pseudoaethalium, pseudocapillititum, spore ornamentation, sporocarp, sporotheca

Full text: PDF (Eng) 1.89M

References
  1. Fiore-Donno A.M., Berney C., Pawlowski J., Baldauf S.L. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 2005, 52: 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00032.x
  2. Fiore-Donno A.M., Meyer M., Baldauf S.L., Pawlowski J. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2008, 46: 878–889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.12.011
  3. Fiore-Donno A.M., Kamono A., Meyer M., Schnittler M., Fukui M., Cavalier-Smith T. PLoS One, 2012, 7(4): e35359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035359
  4. Ing B. The Myxomycetes of Britain and Ireland. An identification Handbook, Slough: The Richmond Publishing Co. Ltd., 1999, 374 pp.
  5. Lado C., Pando F. Myxomycetes. In: Flora Mycologica Iberica, Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico, J. Cramer, 1997, vol. 1, 324 pp.
  6. Leontyev D., Schnittler M., Moreno Horcajada G., Stephenson S., Mitchell D.W., Rojas C. Mycologia, 2014a, 106(5): 936–948. http://dx.doi.org/10.3852/13-314
  7. Leontyev D.V., Schnittler M., Stephenson S.L. Mycologia, 2014b, 106(6): 1212–1219. http://dx.doi.org/10.3852/14-075
  8. Leontyev D.V., Schnittler M., Stephenson S.L. Nova Hegwigia, 2014c, 99(3–4): 441–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2014/0209
  9. Leontyev D., Schnittler M., Stephenson S.L. Mycologia, 2015, 107(5): 959–985. http://dx.doi.org/10.3852/14-271
  10. Leontyev D.V. Ukr. Bot. J., 2015, 72(2): 147–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj72.02.147
  11. Nannenga-Bremekamp N.E. A Guide to Temperate Myxomycota, Bristol: Biopress Ltd., 1991, 410 pp.
  12. Neubert H., Nowotny W., Baumann K. Die Myxomyceten Deutschlands und des angrenzenden Alpenraumes unter besonderer Berücksichtigung Österreichs, Gomaringen: Karlheinz Baumann Verlag., 1993, vol. 1, 340 S.
  13. Poulain M., Meyer M., Bozonnet J. Les Myxomycètes, Dauphiné-Savoie: Fédération mycologique et botanique, 2011, vol. 1, 568 pp.
  14. Schnittler M. In: Abstracts of the Fourth International Congress of the Systematics and Ecology of Myxomycetes, Brussels: Universa, 2002, p. 82.